Mastercard $19 billion lawsuit is UK's biggest-ever damages claim

The Mastercard claim is the biggest in British legal history and could bring a payout to 46 million British users of MasterCard credit and debit cards.

Jonathan Bainbridge/Reuters/File
MasterCard credit cards in a wallet.

 MasterCard is being sued for 14 billion pounds ($18.6 billion) in Britain for allegedly charging excessive fees on millions of transactions over a 16-year period.

Law firm Quinn Emanuel filed the suit Thursday at the Competition Appeal Tribunal for Walter Merricks, a former U.K. financial services ombudsman.

The firm says the claim is the biggest in British legal history and could bring a payout to 46 million British users ofMasterCard credit and debit cards.

The suit alleges that MasterCard charged stores unlawfully high fees on transactions between 1992 and 2008, which were passed on to consumers in the form of inflated prices for goods and services.

"The filing of this claim is the first step towards consumers obtaining compensation for what MasterCard did," Merricks said, calling it "a watershed moment for consumer redress in this country."

Under Britain's new Consumer Rights Act, all U.K. consumers who paid the charges and currently live in Britain will automatically become part of the group of claimants — and eligible for compensation — unless they explicitly opt out.

The suit follows a 2014 ruling by the European Union's highest court that the fees violated EU antitrust rules.

MasterCard said in a statement that "we continue to firmly disagree with the basis of this claim and we intend to oppose it vigorously."

The tribunal will rule late this year whether the case can proceed, the law firm said. If so, it is expected to go to court in 2018.

Shares in MasterCard Inc. were down 1 percent in pre-market electronic trading in New York.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.