Audrey McAvoy/AP/File
Workers cut sugar cane at Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar, in Puunene, Hawaii, April 27, 2010. The owners of Hawaii's last sugar plantation say they're getting out of the sugar-growing business. Sugar cane fields once spread across the islands, providing work to thousands of immigrants and shaping Hawaii life.

Why sugar, once a big business in Hawaii, is now disappearing

Hawaii's last sugar plantation is closing, marking the end of a powerful force in Hawaii's state economy.

Alexander & Baldwin Inc., Hawaii’s last sugar plantation, announced Wednesday that it would phase out growing sugar by 2016, marking the end of sugar’s dominance in the state's economy.

"This is a sad day for A&B, and it is with great regret that we have reached this decision," Christopher Benjamin, CEO of Alexander and Baldwin, said in a news release.

The company announced that its 36,000 acre Maui plantation will be divided into smaller farms to grow different crops like papaya and fruit trees, and that everyone who worked for its sugar subsidiary company will be laid off, although they will retain some workers to complete this year’s sugar harvest.

Alexander & Baldwin was founded in 1870 by descendants of Protestant missionaries to Hawaii. Sugar and pineapple plantations were once the biggest drivers of the Hawaiian economy, assisted in part by changes in tariff law that made exports from what was then the Hawaiian Kingdom essentially duty-free. Hawaii owes much of its current cultural diversity to the descendants of the laborers who were brought to the islands to work in the fields.

Plantation crops continued to dominate the Hawaiian economy until tourism became cheaper with the advent of passenger air travel. Many plantations began to close in the 1950s, a pace that has been quickening ever since. Florida is now the biggest producer of cane sugar in the United States, producing about 2 million tons to Hawaii’s 165,000 in 2015.

In the news release, Mr. Benjamin said that Alexander & Baldwin had “made every effort to avoid having to take this action,” but the company expected to lose $30 million in agribusiness costs for fiscal year 2015 and perhaps more over time if they did not make changes.

The company hopes to shield itself from the vulnerability of a single crop market by pursuing a "diversified agricultural model" that divides the Maui plantation into smaller parcels of land for cultivation of different crops, including some that may be produced for biogas purposes. Alexander & Baldwin is also exploring the possibility of selling some of its land to local farmers for food or livestock production.

Maui Mayor Alan Arakawa said that while he was saddened by the news and the impact it would have on the affected employees, he was also optimistic that agriculture would be able to continue on Hawaii.

"Fruit trees, taro, biomass, papayas, avocados and much more have all gone through trial testing, leaving us very confident that while sugarcane is dead, agriculture will remain very much alive here," he said in a statement.

"For over 130 years, sugar production on Maui was more than a business, spawning a way of life and generations of hard working women and men who made our state remarkable and great," US Sen. Brian Schatz (D) of Hawaii said in a statement.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Why sugar, once a big business in Hawaii, is now disappearing
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today