Smith & Wesson: Gun sales decline, but demand is still strong

Firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson reported its net sales were down 4.6 percent Thursday, while its shares were down about 10 percent Friday. Demand for guns, however, still remains high with the looming possibility of stricter gun laws.

Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/File
A Smith & Wesson 9mm handgun sits on display at the 132nd Annual National Rifle Association Meeting in Orlando, Fla., April 27, 2003. Smith & Wesson reported its net sales were down 4.6 percent Thursday, while its shares were down about 10 percent Friday.

After riding the wave of a booming US gun market over the past few years, firearms manufacturer Smith & Wesson reported disappointing fourth quarter earnings Thursday. The news sent Smith & Wesson shares sliding Friday morning. 

The Springfield, Mass.-based company's net sales were $170.4 million, a decline of 4.6 percent compared to fourth quarter last year, according to the gunmaker’s press release. Shares slipped 12 percent in premarket trading, and were down 10.35 percent at noon Friday.

Smith & Wesson anticipates net sales for fiscal year 2015 will be between $585 million and $600 million. A Thompson Reuters survey showed that analysts anticipated net sales to be $622 million, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Does this mean the gun industry is in decline after years of robust growth? Hardly. Handgun sales were strong, Smith & Wesson reported, though long gun sales had declined.

The company's stock value, too, is on the rise. This time last year, the gunmaker’s stocks were $9.87 a share, while shares were under $3 in August 2011. Earlier this month, Smith & Wesson peaked at about $17 a share and now hovers around $15.

“We are very pleased with our record results for fiscal 2014, which include the highest sales, gross margin, and profits in the company's history,” Smith & Wesson chief executive officer James Debney says in the press release. “Our successful performance was driven by robust consumer demand for our products, combined with carefully managed increases in our manufacturing capacity.”

Demand for guns have been increasing in recent years for two reasons – politics and mass shootings. Guns sales spiked in 2008 and 2012 following US President Barack Obama’s elections, as the Monitor has reported in 2013. Why? In fear of new restrictions, more people purchase guns sooner rather than later. President Obama has pushed for more laws on gun control throughout his presidency,

Gun sales also tend to spike shortly after mass shootings. After the Sandy Hook shooting in late 2012, gun sales set records in several states, the Monitor reported in 2013. In Colorado, requests for background checks rose 41 percent after the Aurora movie theater shooting, and similar spikes have occurred after other shootings.

Sturm, Ruger & Company, another publicly traded gun manufacturer, has seen similar financial patterns after its stocks and sales peaked. Last month, Sturm, Ruger & Company reported net sales of $169.9 million in the first quarter of 2014, compared with net sales of $155.9 million in the first quarter of 2013. The company's stocks were slightly down Friday to $60 a share, after peaking at almost $85 in January. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.