National Doughnut Day: Is the Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich worth a try?

National Doughnut Day is here, and Dunkin' Donuts is debuting a new, intriguing confection on its menus in celebration. Here’s the Monitor newsroom review of the Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich, for National Doughnut Day.

James Scherer/Dunkin' Brands, Inc./AP/File
This photo provided by Dunkin' Brands, Inc., shows the company's Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich. Dunkin' Donuts debuts the sandwich nationwide Friday, June 7, 2013 in honor of National Doughnut Day.

Dunkin’ Donuts went above and beyond for National Doughnut Day this year. The chain took its celebration of the self-appointed holiday a step further than the requisite complimentary doughnuts for customers and rolled out a new item on menus nationwide Friday: the Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich. Dunkin’ market-tested the sweet and savory combo at its stores in eastern Massachusetts (the heart of Dunkin’ country) in April, amid considerable buzz, and on Friday it landed on the permanent menu.

First, the basics: the Glazed Donut Breakfast Sandwich consists of a fried egg and thin strips of bacon situated between two halves of a glazed donut.  It’s far from nutritious, but not quite the junk bomb you might think: each sandwich has 360 calories, 20 grams of fat, and 13 grams of sugar. Prices will vary, but our sample sandwich from a store in Boston cost $2.99 plus tax.

For Dunkin’ Donuts, the sandwich exemplifies one side of a dual public image that it and many other fast food chains have worked to exhibit in recent years. On one hand, they're working to appear healthier, with offerings like egg white sandwiches and turkey sausage. On the other, there’s a race to see who can offer the most outrageous, decadent item on their menu and pique the interest of a younger crowd (one that, they hope, will be drawn in by the publicity stunt food and stay for the salads and egg whites). McDonald’s has the McRib, Burger King has a bacon ice cream sundae, and Taco Bell has the wildly successful Doritos Locos tacos. And now Dunkin’ Donuts has a breakfast sandwich with a doughnut for bread.

So is it any good? Several members of the Monitor newsroom sampled the sandwich, and reactions ranged from enthusiastic to horrified:

The positive:

“Smells great! If it were just the smell I could eat this every day. Surprisingly complex. You get this sugary blast but also these savory notes. Is anyone eating these extras?” – David J. Unger, Energy and Environment

“It’s sweet and savory, like bacon and syrup together. Darn, I didn’t want to like it, but I do.” – Clayton Collins, Weekly Editor

“It tastes like fried dough at the fair. I’m getting a lot of doughnut.” – Alicia Pflaumer, Web team.

The positive for geographical reasons:

I love it. Maybe it’s because I’m from Indiana.” – Casey Lee, Books

“It’s like really low-rent Southern food. Which is to say it’s not bad!” – Marshall Ingwerson, Managing Editor

The tepid:

“Sweet and eggy. If I didn’t have anything else to eat for breakfast, I’d be grateful for this.” – Mark Trumbull, National News

“It’s not as bad as I thought it was going to be.” – Akane Otani, Business

“Subbing out bread for a donut wasn't the worst thing that could have happened to that sandwich, but it wasn't the best either.” – Ryan Lenora Brown, National and International News, via Twitter

“I was most disappointed by the egg.” – Schuyler Velasco, Business

The bad:

“I was really excited, but it was just uncomfortable for me.” ­– Colby Bermel, OpEd and PMAD desks

“Oh, man, that’s disgusting…I don’t like this at all…I need to throw this away now.” – Andrew Averill, Cover desk

The curious, from a distance:

“I just want to look at it.” – Jenna Fisher, Asia Editor

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.