Why the Feds opted for a sweeping safety review of Boeing 787

Beset by glitches, the pioneering Boeing 787 Dreamliner will undergo a federal safety review, US officials said Friday. The unusual move stems from a series of first-year malfunctions and the plane's unprecedented reliance on electrical systems.

National Transportation Safety Board Investigator Mike Bauer works inside the Boeing 787 'Dreamliner' airplane under investigation at Boston's Logan Airport on Tuesday, in Boston. The government stepped in Friday to assure the public that Boeing's 'Dreamliner' is safe to fly, even as it launched a comprehensive review to find out what caused a fire, a fuel leak, and other worrisome incidents this week.

A federal safety review of Boeing's 787 jetliner promises to bring added scrutiny to the pioneering but glitch-troubled airplane – including inquiries into its heavy reliance on electrical systems and batteries.

For the flying public, that's probably a good thing.

Both the company and federal officials, as well as many outside aviation experts, say they believe the Boeing 787, dubbed the Dreamliner, is safe to fly. But with multiple and varied problems cropping up, including a recent fire during one plane's at-the-terminal transition between flights, the added layer of oversight may help to ensure that any flaws in design or manufacturing are found and fixed as promptly as possible.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood launched the safety review Friday. The move, unusual for its sweeping scope, appears rooted in two facts: the 787's unfortunate series of first-year glitches and, second, the plane's unprecedented reliance on electric controls and batteries to reduce reliance on pneumatic or hydraulic systems. [Editor's note: The original version of this sentence has been revised to give greater specificity about the distinctive features of the Dreamliner that are under review.]

"In light of a series of recent events, the FAA will conduct a comprehensive review of the Boeing 787 critical systems, including the design, manufacture and assembly," the FAA said in announcing the move.

Boeing announced its full cooperation with the review, but also emphasized the Dreamliner's successful safety record during its first year in service. "The airplane has logged 50,000 hours of flight and there are more than 150 flights occurring daily. Its in-service performance is on par with the industry's best-ever introduction into service – the Boeing 777," the company said in a statement. 

Boeing said the regulatory certification process for the aircraft had been the "most robust and rigorous" in FAA history. But it acknowledged that "we have experienced in-service issues in recent months and we are never satisfied while there is room for improvement."

The federal agency joined Boeing in avowing that the plane is fit to fly, even as reviews by Boeing and the agency are under way. But FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said Friday that incidents with the plane warranted the unusual stem-to-stern inquiry. "We need to have a complete understanding of what is happening," he said. "We are conducting the review to further ensure that the aircraft meets our high safety standards.”

Boeing stock lost about 2 percent of its value Friday. The company remains a leading player in making commercial jets, and its total orders for new planes last year were the second highest in company history. 

The Dreamliner represents Boeing's effort to create a state-of-the-art widebody jet for long-haul flights, crossing oceans with a design that's 20 percent more fuel-efficient than the prior generation of aircraft. It relies heavily on lightweight composite materials rather than aluminum, and on lithium ion batteries to power some of its systems.

Rob Mark, publisher of Jetwhine.com, told the Monitor the 787 "is basically an all-electric airplane."

In addition to the fire on a Japan Airlines jet, which caused smoke to enter the cabin while it was parked at Boston’s Logan Airport, recent incidents with the 787 include a fuel leak, a cracked cockpit window, and a flight that was diverted because of electrical problems.

Boeing chief executive officer Jim McNerney said in a statement released Friday that the company stands "100 percent behind the integrity of the 787 and the rigorous process that led to its successful certification and entry into service." He said he expects the review "will underscore our confidence, and the confidence of our customers and the traveling public," in the plane.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why the Feds opted for a sweeping safety review of Boeing 787
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today