Jobs report shows weak August numbers. Will Fed 'ease' the way?

The pace of US job creation was disappointingly slow in August, signaling a recovery that is still weak and fragile as a pivotal election draws close. Will the Fed maintain low interest rates?

Seth Wenig/AP
Job seekers fill out applications at a construction job fair in New York. U.S. employers added 96,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department said Friday, a weak figure that could slow any momentum President Barack Obama hoped to gain from his speech to the Democratic National Convention.

The pace of US job creation was disappointingly slow in August, signaling a recovery that is still weak and fragile as a pivotal election draws close.

Employers added 96,000 jobs during the month, following gains of 141,000 in July and 45,000 in June. The August figure, reported by the Labor Department Friday, also showed little change from August 2011's number.

The unemployment rate continued to hover near the level where it's been in recent months, edging down to 8.1 percent.

"Jobs growth was anemic, and even the drop in the unemployment rate was bad news because it happened for the 'wrong' reason, a declining labor force rather than rising employment," Nigel Gault, chief US economist at IHS Global Insight, wrote in an analysis of the August numbers. "Today's weak report should seal the deal for more easing from the Fed on September 13."

The labor force, the number of people either working or actively seeking work, declined by 368,000 for the month.

Mr. Gault said he expects the Federal Reserve to extend the duration of its pledge to maintain low interest rates, from 2014 into mid-2015, and to launch a "QE3" program of bond purchases, focused on mortgage-backed securities worth $500 billion to 600 billion. The nickname for the asset purchase program stands for "quantitative easing," round 3.

Prior "QE" rounds have come as the Fed has sought ways to spur growth at a time when it has already reduced short-term borrowing costs for banks to about zero percent.

While Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has recently called tepid job growth a "grave concern," economists differ on whether a QE3 program will have much stimulative effect. Supporters say it could reduce already-low long-term interest rates, helping to spur housing-market activity among other things, and that it could have a modest positive effect on stock prices.

Skeptics say what would really boost the economy is help the Fed can't give – including better fiscal policy on government spending and taxes. That could give businesses confidence that an economic expansion will continue, thus making the case for new investment and hiring.

The tepid job figures come with the election just two months away, and the numbers mesh with campaign arguments already being emphasized in the presidential campaign.

President Obama is urging voters to stick with him, to be patient, and that better times will come soon. He argues that his opponent's policies will put the economy on a worse track.

Republican challenger Mitt Romney is arguing that the economy isn't performing nearly well enough, given that the financial crisis ended early in Obama's first term, and that a new approach is needed to fuel growth.

For now, the two are locked in a close battle, judging by recent polls.

A vital question, to be resolved in coming months, is the "fiscal cliff" of expiring tax cuts at the end of the year. If Congress and the White House can't agree on some bargain, a scheduled rise in tax rates could hit consumer pocketbooks and business confidence. 

Both Democrats and Republicans are saying this wouldn't be good for the economy, and forecasters generally expect some deal soon after the November vote to avert a sudden downshift in the economy. But for now the two sides seem more focused on how to win the elections than on finding a compromise.

Also at stake in the election is the longer-term course of fiscal policy: Whether to tame federal deficits more by spending cuts or tax hikes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.