Final Four: What UK vs Louisville means for the Bluegrass state

A Final Four berth means exposure and often major dollars for universities. But two Final Four berths? University of Kentucky Wildcats vs. the Louisville Cardinals is a huge boon for the state of Kentucky. 

Chris Keane/Reuters
Baylor Bears forward Quincy Acy (C) drives to the net on Kentucky Wildcats forward Anthony Davis (L) and forward Terrence Jones during the first half of their men's NCAA South Regional basketball game in Atlanta, Georgia last week. Kentucky will face their cross-state rivals, Lousiville, in an NCAA Final Four game Saturday.

Bitter rivalries are the lifeblood of college sports. But rarely do the stakes get so high as they will this Saturday evening, when the University of Kentucky Wildcats and the Louisville Cardinals go head to head for a shot at the NCAA title game in New Orleans. It’s the most important game in the rivalry’s history, with the two teams never having met this late in the tournament.

Duke and North Carolina’s legendary enmity has long been the standard against which all college men’s basketball rivalries are judged, but with a good game Saturday, the “Battle of the Bluegrass” will certainly make its case to be near the top.

The two teams first met in 1913, with Kentucky winning 34-10. The rivalry went dormant through most of the middle of the 20th century, only to be resurrected by state government intervention. Seriously: In 1983, Kentucky governor John R. Brown Jr. pushed a bill through the state’s legislature forcing the two teams to play each other during the regular season. Both programs have a rich history of winning: The Cardinals have two national championships and nine Final Four appearances. The Wildcats, meanwhile, have the winningest program in men’s college basketball history, with seven national championships and 15 Final Four appearances.

The Wildcats are heavily favored to win on Saturday, but though a large swath of its citizens will be inevitably heartbroken after the game, the Commonwealth of Kentucky itself may be the big winner in all of this. For one, the state gets a moment of visibility in the sports world that’s rare: Kentucky doesn’t have any major professional sports teams, and college football doesn’t dominate the landscape the way it does in most other Southern states. College basketball is king, so having the state’s two biggest programs showcased – together– on a national stage is a further opportunity to catch the attention of top tier high school recruits and new fans.  Last year’s pair of Final Four games were the highest-rated since 2005: Butler’s win over Virginia Commonwealth netted an average of 14.2 million viewers, while Connecticut’s win over Kentucky garnered 16.7 million viewers.

Along with that audience comes a number of factors that can help a university’s bottom line, including increased applications, alumni donations, and merchandise sales. After its Final Four run last year, Butler, a 4,500-student private university in Indiana, saw its application rates jump 41 percent. That year’s other Final Four Cinderalla team, VCU, found itself as a Top 5 Google search term.

The front-end costs for a team headed to the Final Four can be steep: In addition to selling a guaranteed number of tickets and buying up hotel rooms, a school must set aside $32,000 to throw a party (really), but the benefits, especially for lesser-known schools, can be immeasurable.

The coaches aren’t complaining, either. In addition to his $3.8 million annual base salary (set to get a $1 million bump starting next season), Wildcats coach John Calipari got a $50,000 bonus for winning the regular season SEC title, $100,000 each for making the NCAA regional semifinals and finals, and $150,000 for taking UK to the Final Four, according to an Associated Press report reviewing each of the Final Four coaches’ contracts. If the Wildcats win the whole shebang, as they look poised to do, Calipari gets an extra $350,000 on top of that.

Louisville coach Rick Pitino, meanwhile, stands to make similar bank. His base salary is $3 million, and he made an extra $50,000 when the Cardinals took the Big East. Another $50,000 followed the NCAA regional semifinals and finals, then $75,000 more for the Final Four trip. If the Cardinals can pull off the upset and win the whole thing, he’ll get another $150,000.

The fans, meanwhile, get the rare privilege of seeing the two teams duke it out on one of the biggest stage in sports. Most college rivalries, including Duke/UNC, are contained within a conference, meaning that no matter how ferocious, a rivalry game rarely has implications beyond the regular season (one glaring exception was January’s college football national championship, when co-SEC teams LSU and Alabama played for the title). Big game grudge matchups do happen, like when the University of Florida Gators played the Florida State Seminoles for a college football national title in 1997, but a rivalry as storied as Kentucky-Louisville attaining such high stakes is a special treat.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to