'To Walk Invisible' brings to life the Brontes and the genius forged on the moors

Now, as a tribute to the 19th-century siblings who have become something of a public television franchise, 'To Walk Invisible' dramatizes the lives of the Brontes themselves.

'To Walk Invisible' stars Chloe Pirrie (Emily Bronte), Charlie Murphy (Anne Bronte), and Finn Atkins (Charlotte Bronte).

Think of “To Walk Invisible,” which debuted last night on public television’s “Masterpiece,” and is now streaming for free at pbs.org, as a thank-you note to the Bronte sisters for giving “Masterpiece” so much material.

The Brontes – Charlotte, Emily and Anne – wrote novels that have inspired several lavish “Masterpiece” adaptations over the years. Anne’s “The Tennant of Wildfell Hall” drew praise in 1997, and Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” prompted two “Masterpiece” projects airing in 1998 and 2009. Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” which aired as a “Masterpiece” production in 2007, garnered three Emmys.

Now, as a tribute to the 19th-century siblings who have become something of a public television franchise, “To Walk Invisible” dramatizes the lives of the Brontes themselves.

The Brontes grew up in Yorkshire as the daughters of a clergyman – an ostensibly sheltered existence that left many readers wondering how the women’s novels could be so insightful about madness and scandal. “To Walk Invisible” walks viewers through the darker aspects of the Bronte household, suggesting how family tragedy informed the sisters’ sometimes stormy fiction.

Adam Nagaitis plays Branwell, the Brontes’ brother, whose own literary ambitions were doomed by alcohol and opium addiction. As family patriarch Rev. Patrick Bronte (Jonathan Pryce) goes blind, the Brontes seemed poised for emotional and financial ruin.

It’s up to Charlotte (Finn Atkins), Emily (Chloe Pirrie), and Anne (Charlie Murphy) to secure the family’s destiny by writing the novels that would earn them enduring fame – an ambition that forces them to publish under pen names because women writers of the time wouldn’t be taken seriously.

Charlotte, who wanted anonymity for other reasons, expressed the wish that inspired the title of Sunday’s drama: “I think if a good fairy were to offer me the choice of a gift, I would say – grant me the power to walk invisible.”

Walking on the moors was something of a family pastime, a reality only faintly suggested in Sunday’s show. Most of the action unfolds in an exact replica of the Bronte parsonage, its shadowy interior expressing the brooding sensibility of writer-director Sally Wainwright’s production.

There are occasional hints of happier times, with fleeting flashbacks to the sisters’ childhoods. For a fuller exploration of the Bronte sisters’ origins, including the more life-affirming aspects of their literary origins, readers should check out Deborah Lutz’s 2015 study, “The Bronte Cabinet,” which includes an intriguing look at how their girlhood playfulness shaped their literary genius.

The best way to explore the Brontes’ legacy, of course, is reading their novels. With any luck, “To Walk Invisible” will send viewers back to their fiction, or nudge them to experience it for the first time.

– Danny Heitman, a columnist for The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana, is the author of “A Summer of Birds: John James Audubon at Oakley House.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.