Man Booker Prize 2015: Here are the authors who made the shortlist

Marlon James, the author of 'A Brief History of Seven Killings,' is the first Jamaican author to have his or her work make it to the finals.

'A Brief History of Seven Killings' is by Marlon James.

The shortlist for the prestigious Man Booker Prize was recently released. 

Author Anne Tyler made the list for her work “A Spool of Blue Thread,” as did Chigozie Obioma for Obioma’s book “The Fishermen.” Sunjeev Sahota made the cut for the book “The Year of the Runaways” and so did Hanya Yanagihara for “A Little Life,” Marlon James for “A Brief History of Seven Killings,” and Tom McCarthy for “Satin Island.” 

With “Killings” having made the cut, James became the first Jamaican author to have his or her work appear on the Man Booker shortlist. 

The winner of this year’s Man Booker Prize will be announced on Oct. 13 (so no, you don’t have much time to try to read all these).

Last year’s Man Booker Prize was taken by author Richard Flanagan, who won for his work “The Narrow Road to the Deep North.” 

The Man Booker Prize, which has been won by authors including Hilary Mantel, Julian Barnes, and Anne Enright, encountered controversy last year after those behind the prize announced that any book that was released in English and was available in Britain would be eligible for it. Before then, only writers who hailed from Britain, Ireland, Zimbabwe, or one of the Commonwealth countries could be eligible for the award.

The move was welcomed by some in the literary community and decried by others. “The world has changed and it no longer makes sense to split up the writing world in this way,” Kazuo Ishigoro of “Never Let Me Go” said at the time. But author Linda Grant said she thought the decision wasn’t a good one because those who aren't US citizens can’t win another major prize, the Pulitzer. 

“There are two career-changing prizes, the Booker and the Pulitzer,” she said. “If the Booker is open to US authors, it will create a huge imbalance.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.