'The Divergent Series': Here's a look at the new titles for the final two movies

The upcoming final two movies in the 'Divergent' film series, which are both based on Veronica Roth's book 'Allegiant,' recently got a name change. The next 'Divergent' movie is due to be released this March.

Andrew Cooper/Lionsgate/AP
The 'Divergent' film series stars Theo James (l.), Shailene Woodley (center), and Miles Teller (r.).

Movie studio Lionsgate recently announced the titles of their forthcoming films based on “Allegiant,” Veronica Roth’s final book in her “Divergent” trilogy.

The second film in the series, “Insurgent,” was released this past March. The first of the final two films, now titled “The Divergent Series: Allegiant,” will be released this coming March with the last film in the movie series, now titled “The Divergent Series: Ascendant,” to follow in the spring of 2017. 

The “Divergent” film series is based on the trilogy by Roth, which centers on a girl named Tris (Shailene Woodley) who lives in a dystopian version of Chicago where people are sorted into factions based on their character traits. The films co-star Theo James, Miles Teller, and Kate Winslet.

For fans of young adult book series adapted as movies, the decision to split the final book into two movies will come as anything but a surprise. The idea went high-profile with the “Harry Potter” franchise, where the last book, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” was split into two films. Since then, fellow franchises like “Twilight” and “The Hunger Games” have followed suit. This can lead to some wordy titles, as with the upcoming movie “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2.” Perhaps the title change for the “Divergent” movies is an attempt to avoid the extra punctuation. 

With the release of the upcoming "Mockingjay” movie, one of the most lucrative young adult book series adaptations ever is coming to a close. The “Divergent” movie series has done well but its domestic gross has not come close to the numbers of “Harry” or “Hunger Games.” While “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1” was the second-highest-grossing movie domestically of 2014, “Divergent” was far below that at number 19. While the yearly domestic gross numbers for 2015 obviously have plenty of time to change, “The Divergent Series: Insurgent” is currently at number 16. 

In order for a young adult book series adaptation to gross “Harry” or “Hunger Games"-like numbers, it would need to have the zeitgeist-dominating power that those two series had. “Twilight” was also a cultural phenomenon in its time and did accordingly well at the box office, grossing numbers that were in the league of “Harry” and “Hunger Games” (“The Twilight Saga: Eclipse” actually topped “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1” at the domestic box office).  

“Divergent” is a popular book series but didn’t dominate pop culture during the time that it was published, nor did the books that were the basis of current movie franchise “The Maze Runner” or the upcoming film “The 5th Wave.” To create a hit of "Potter" or "Hunger Games" magnitude, Hollywood may have to wait for another book series – one with the power to entice teens and adults alike even as it becomes a dominant part of popular culture.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.