'The Girl on the Train' rockets up sales charts, receives more critical praise

'The Girl on the Train' is by Paula Hawkins.

'The Girl on the Train' is by Paula Hawkins.

“The Girl on the Train” has left the station and shows no sign of slowing. 

As we previously reported, the novel “Train,” by Paula Hawkins, which centers on a woman who watches a couple from a train and becomes a suspect when the wife goes missing, was released on Jan. 13 and quickly became the subject of enthusiastic reviews. Amazon selected it as one of the best titles coming out this month and various critics praised the book, with lines like: “’The Girl on the Train’ has more fun with unreliable narration than any chiller since ‘Gone Girl,’”; “Calling it now: The Girl on the Train is the next Gone Girl”; and “[Hawkins is] the new voice for the new year everyone’s buzzing about,” among other reviews.

Now sales are reflecting the buzz. “Train” is currently ranked number three on the Amazon bestseller list, number seven on the Barnes & Noble bestseller list, and came in at number two on the IndieBound hardcover fiction list for the week of Jan. 22.

In the meantime, “Train” has picked up more critical praise. Guardian writer Suzi Feay said of the book, “Hawkins has come up with an ingenious slant on the currently fashionable amnesia thriller…. Hawkins juggles perspectives and timescales with great skill, and considerable suspense builds up along with empathy for an unusual central character.” NPR critic Michael Schaub wrote that the book is “perfectly paced, from its arresting beginning to its twist ending; it's not an easy book to put down…. [T]he people we meet in ‘The Girl on the Train’ are drawn beautifully…. Hawkins uses [alternating points of view] masterfully…. Hawkins' writing is excellent, and also cinematic, in the best possible way.” Meanwhile, Leah Greenblatt of Entertainment Weekly awarded it an A-, writing “Paula Hawkins … pulls off a thriller's toughest trick: carefully assembling everything we think we know, until it reveals the one thing we didn't see coming.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.