'Moriarty': Does it live up to Anthony Horowitz's previous 'Sherlock Holmes' tale?

Horowitz won over critics with his 'Holmes' book 'The House of Silk,' but his take on Holmes's greatest adversary, 'Moriarty,' has received more mixed reviews so far.

'Moriarty' is by Anthony Horowitz.

Anthony Horowitz scored with his take on Sherlock Holmes, “The House of Silk,” but his new tale about Holmes’s greatest nemesis, “Moriarty,” is receiving more mixed reviews.

“Silk” was released in 2011 as the first “Holmes” title to be authorized by the Arthur Conan Doyle estate. The book received widespread praise for the all-new adventure Horowitz created for Holmes and his faithful sidekick Watson, with Publishers Weekly writing that “the hype … is amply justified…. Horowitz gets everything right.” Washington Post critic Michael Dirda called the book “exceptionally entertaining.”

(Horowitz has also been selected to write a new “James Bond” novel with the approval of the Ian Fleming estate. That book is scheduled for publication in fall of 2015.)

So for his new adventure set in Conan Doyle’s world, Horowitz selected Professor Moriarty, the legendary nemesis of Holmes. (The book, named after the character, is now available abroad and is scheduled for release in the US on Dec. 9.) The new book follows American Pinkerton agent Frederick Chase and Athelney Jones of Scotland Yard after the supposed deaths of Holmes and Moriarty at Reichenbach Falls as Frederick and Athelney try to find a man who seems to be attempting to take over Moriarty’s position as leader of crime.

Amazon selected “Moriarty” as one of its 10 best books of December, with Neal Thompson of Amazon writing, “Horowitz’s fresh take on the legend of Sherlock Holmes pays homage to the original while infusing it with his own slick and twisty style.”

Kirkus Reviews was also impressed by the book, awarding it a starred review and writing, “A tour de force…. Readers who aren't put off by the Hollywood pacing, with action set pieces less like Conan Doyle than the Robert Downey Jr. movies, are in for a rare treat, a mystery as original as it is enthralling.” 

However, some other critics have been less enthusiastic. Publishers Weekly found the new book to be “disappointing…. As a pair, Jones and Chase are but a pale shadow of Holmes and Watson.” And Guardian critic Robert McCrum wrote, “To revisit Victorian London, in the months after the Reichenbach Falls disaster, with Holmes dead and Dr Watson absent, is to test narrative ingenuity to the limits of credibility…. [A] twist in the tale … is clever but contrived…. The atmosphere of smoke and mirrors in which Moriarty winds up will doubtless enthrall Sherlock fans, but runs the risk of leaving the general reader cold.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Moriarty': Does it live up to Anthony Horowitz's previous 'Sherlock Holmes' tale?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today