For Halloween, a collection of scary stories by literary greats

This collection of 19th-century ghost tales includes works by Charles Dickens, Arthur Conan Doyle, and Henry James.

What better way to celebrate Halloween than with a collection of Victorian-era ghost stories?

On Halloween, a day devoted to scary stories, editor and author Michael Sims has a first-person recollection that ranks as a real spine-tingler. It’s about the day he fell into an open grave, seeing the view as few living people do – from the bottom up, not the top down.

Just in time for All Hallow’s Eve, Sims has released The Phantom Coach, a collection of classic Victorian ghost stories published by Bloomsbury in a softcover edition. The book includes creepy tales from Charles Dickens, Arthur Conan Doyle, Henry James, Rudyard Kipling, and Ambrose Bierce, among others.

Sims, who edited the anthology, tells readers in his introduction that he had a personal experience with terror – a moment every bit as chilling, one gathers, as the tales he’s assembled from 19th-century masters of the macabre.

“I remember the view from the grave,” Sims tells readers. “Stars spiraled in front of my eyes when I hit the damp soil at the bottom. Up there on the faraway earth, past six feet of square muddy wall, a man and a boy stared down at me – my brothers, Gary and David, both laughing. Until I slipped and fell in the grave, we had been setting up the graveside for a funeral.”

Gary, 11 years older than Sims, worked for a funeral home, and Michael was helping him out. Michael Sims’s moment in the grave didn’t last long, but it deepened his appreciation of ghost stories.

“I have always enjoyed ghost stories,” he writes. “Perhaps keeping death in cautionary view provides a frisson of mortality that helps us squeeze a more exquisite juice out of the ephemeral moment.”

In that way, ghost stories – and, by extension, Halloween – is a way to seize life, not death.

A nice sentiment to keep in mind as the trick-or-treaters arrive – or when combing the pages of “The Phantom Coach.”

Danny Heitman, a columnist for The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana, is the author of “A Summer of Birds: John James Audubon at Oakley House."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.