Lena Dunham will adapt 'Catherine, Called Birdy' as a film

'Catherine' is by writer Karen Cushman.

'Catherine, Called Birdy' is by Karen Cushman.

“Girls” creator, star, and writer Lena Dunham has announced she’s shepherding an adaptation of the novel “Catherine, Called Birdy” by Karen Cushman to the big screen. 

Dunham discussed her involvement with the planned movie adaptation of the young adult novel at the New Yorker Festival on Oct. 10.

“I’m going to adapt it and hopefully direct it,” she said, according to Variety. “I just need to find someone who wants to fund a PG-13 medieval movie.”

She said of the narrative, “It’s hyper realistic and really pretty and it’s full of incest and beatings, but it’s a child’s story," according to the Los Angeles Times. "I’ve been obsessed with it since I was a kid.”

“Catherine” centers on the girl of the title, who is 14 and living in the year 1290. She is the daughter of a knight and tries to avoid getting married. It was first published in 1994 and is a Newbery Honor title. It received many positive reviews upon release, with School Library Journal giving it a starred review and calling the protagonist “a delightful, rebellious heroine” and writing that the book is “superb historical fiction,” while Publishers Weekly wrote that Cushman’s novel “introduces an admirable heroine and pungently evokes a largely unfamiliar setting.”

Cushman is also the author of such titles as  “Matilda Bone,” “Will Sparrow’s Road,” “The Ballad of Lucy Whipple,” and “The Midwife’s Apprentice,” which won the Newbery Medal. “Whipple” was adapted as a TV movie starring Glenn Close and Jena Malone in 2001.

Dunham herself recently became an author with the publication of her memoir “Not That Kind of Girl,” which was published on Sept. 30. It’s currently ranked at second place on the New York Times combined print and e-book nonfiction list for Oct. 19 and NYT critic Michiko Kakutani called the work “as acute and heartfelt as it is funny.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.