Will author Thomas Pynchon make a cameo in the movie 'Inherent Vice'?

Pynchon's novel 'Vice' is the basis for the upcoming movie of the same name.

'Inherent Vice' is by Thomas Pynchon.

Will author Thomas Pynchon soon be appearing on the big screen?

Pynchon, who is the writer behind such novels as “Gravity’s Rainbow,” “Bleeding Edge,” and “The Crying of Lot 49,” is having his novel “Inherent Vice” adapted as a film by “The Master” director Paul Thomas Anderson. The cast includes Joaquin Phoenix, Josh Brolin, Owen Wilson, Benicio del Toro, and many more. 

Brolin recently told the New York Times that Pynchon himself will be appearing in the film as well – interesting trivia considering, according to NPR, there isn’t even a picture of the writer that’s less than 50 years old.

Brolin discussed the author’s time on set. “I don’t think anybody knew [he was there],” the actor told the NYT. “He came on as the kind of mercurial iconoclast he is. He stayed in the corner.”

Anderson, who also adapted the novel for the screen, wouldn’t discuss whether the cameo was happening or not. “I’m staying out of it,” he told the NYT. “No. No. I just… Somebody spent a long time deciding not to have themselves out there. There’s a reason for that. So I’m just going to step out of that.”

The movie centers on Larry Sportello (Phoenix), a detective who comes to learn about the life of real estate businessman Mickey Wolfmann (Eric Roberts), the new romantic interest of his ex-girlfriend Shasta (Katherine Waterston).

“Vice” is being released on Dec. 12 and it’s being brought up as a possibility for Oscar prizes, though many industry watchers are withholding judgment until the movie’s released. Indiewire writer Peter Knegt says the film is a “strong contender… (at least on paper)” for a Best Picture nomination and David Sims of The Wire writes of “Vice,” “Every upcoming P.T. Anderson project requires our attention even if half the time they end up missing at the Oscars.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.