'My Salinger Year' author Joanna Rakoff talks about her professional friendship with J.D. Salinger

Joanna Rakoff, author of ‘My Salinger Year,’ says her contact with J.D. Salinger left her feeling that 'he was very different from this popular portrayal of him.'

Daniel Ignaszewski/Knopf
Joanna Rakoff says that her job for a NY literary agent involved occasional phone conversations with J.D. Salinger, who used to tell her, 'You’re a poet. You’re not a receptionist. You need to wake up and write every day.'

Joanna Rakoff’s first job out of graduate school at a New York literary agency offered many surprises, including acquaintance with reclusive author J.D. Salinger. Rakoff recently talked with Monitor books editor Marjorie Kehe about her new memoir, My Salinger Year. Here are excerpts of their conversation.  

Q: What was the strangest thing about your job? 

Everything! This was a place where no one explained anything to you. They regarded themselves almost as a sort of celebrity entity and so they assumed that you would already know everything about what they did.

Q: Which is why they didn’t bother to tell you that Jerry – their principal client – was actually J.D. Salinger? 
 
They were this way about everyone, from the office manager to J.D. Salinger. [Also] technologically they were quite behind the times. This was 1996 and they had just recently acquired a copy machine. The fax machine was this newfangled object [to them].

There was no voice mail. There were no overhead lights. It was a dark wood-paneled office. It looked like a library or someone’s apartment. There was a receptionist who was only there during business hours and if you called outside those hours the phone just rang. It was quite archaic.

But I loved it. I found it fascinating.

Q: The job also introduced you to Salinger. Was he different from his public image? 

[In some books] he is portrayed as being a cranky eccentric, if not totally deranged. I was of course dealing with him on matters of business and not personal matters. But he was always very kind to me, very polite as people of a different era tend to be.

My boss led me to believe that he wouldn’t have time for me, that I shouldn’t keep him on the phone. But I found that it was he who wanted to talk to me.

He was very different from this popular portrayal of him.

Q: You read and responded to Salinger’s fan mail and came to sympathize with his decision to keep his fans – and the world – at a distance. Why?

My perception is that two things factored into that. One is that Salinger was rather like his famous character Seymour Glass and he was too sensitive to the world. He couldn’t just send a form letter to people pouring out their hearts to him. It made him just want to cry or kill himself.

The other reason is that he received some death threats and threats of violence toward him and his children, and he just felt like he couldn’t do it anymore, which is pretty understandable.

Q. Your boss is also a strong – and poignant – character in your book. Did knowing her shape or change you in some way?

Yes. Definitely. Many people have been comparing this book to “The Devil Wears Prada” and I’m honestly quite shocked by that. [My boss] was an imperious person but she did not take pleasure on being cruel to her employees by any means. She was a pretty complicated person and she had an enormous impact on me.

I sort of was looking around me for models. How do I be? What is my life going to be? What are my options here? As a child I hadn’t seen that many professional women in the kind of conservative suburb in which I grew up. The families were very conventional and I knew I didn’t want that life. My boss, like many women of her generation, had sacrificed her personal life to her job. She was kind of married to the agency. It really did make me think: Okay, here’s one option and it’s not the option that I want. It factored into my leaving and trying to figure out what I wanted from life.

Because my boss didn’t seem happy. If she had seemed happy and thrilled and at peace with herself that would have been another thing. But she did not. Nor did she seem happy with her life outside the office. She was kind of a cautionary tale.

But she also taught me so much about how to be a grownup. At first she was an enigma to me. She just kind of seemed to me like this person who was always ordering me around. But as time went on I saw that she was a more complicated person.

I was still a child when I took the job. Knowing her made me understand the nuances and complications of adult life, to realize that people make mistakes. No one is who they seem to be. 

Q: And how about Salinger? Did your contact with him change you and your life? 

Specifically, he changed my writing habits. I’ve always been a pretty disciplined person, but I had trouble giving myself permission to wake up an hour or two early every morning before work to write. But in my conversations with Salinger he would say to me, “You’re a poet. You’re not a receptionist. You need to wake up and write every day.”

And just the fact that one of the world’s most famous living writers took me seriously and told me “You’re a poet” gave me the authority to take myself seriously.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.