'The Silkworm': Here's what critics are saying about J.K. Rowling's latest

'The Silkworm' is a sequel to the mystery 'The Cuckoo's Calling,' which, like 'Silkworm,' Rowling wrote under the pen name Robert Galbraith.

'The Silkworm' is by J.K. Rowling under the pen name Robert Galbraith.

It might just be the most anticipated detective novel of the summer. “The Silkworm” hits shelves later this week, and readers are as excited about the release of the second Cormoran Strike novel as they are about its author – Robert Galbraith, a.ka. J.K. Rowling, whose identity was leaked last year. 

A sequel to “The Cuckoo’s Calling," which focused on the stratospheric world of supermodels, rock stars, and movie producers, “The Silkworm” turns its focus on Rowling’s ilk – literary London, with its bloated egos, haughty snobbery, and bloodthirsty competition. 

The novel centers around the disappearance of star novelist Owen Quine, whose gruesome death, revealed later in one of the goriest scenes Rowling has ever written, has London’s literary scene stunned. Quine leaves behind a scandalous manuscript, a roman à clef skewering his closest intimates and many in the book world with libelous caricatures – and possibly clues. One-legged detective Cormoran Strike and his sidekick Robin use those clues to exonerate their client, whom the authorities have singled out as Quine’s killer.

While it’s unlikely to garner any literary prizes, Rowling’s second detective novel will be well-received, if early reviews are any indication. 

The New York Times calls it “an entertaining novel in which the most compelling characters are not the killer or the victim, but the detectives charged with solving the crime.” 

And although reviewer Michiko Kakutani says “Ms. Rowling has some difficulty in the opening chapters of 'Silkworm' establishing the personalities and peccadilloes of the chief suspects,” she praises Rowling’s “instinctive sense of storytelling and her ability to make the reader sympathize with Strike and Robin.”

USA Today calls it “a great detective novel: sharp, immensely readable, warm-hearted but cool-headed, with a solution worthy of the immaculately plotted Harry Potter series.” 

The newspaper also has high praise for Rowling, which it compares to Charles Dickens. “[L]ike him, she has prodigious, otherworldly gifts of invention, and like him she has a fierce satirical instinct….”

For Washington Post reviewer Louis Bayard, "likable” was the first word that came to mind after completing the novel; Bayard says Rowling’s pleasure in her newly chosen genre is “palpable.”

Like many reviewers, Bayard says Rowling particularly shines within the confines of genre, where she seems to embrace the rules of the literary category to great effect.

Rowling “crafts a plot as well as anyone alive,” writes the Daily Beast, adding “she’s not too shabby in the character department either.” It calls “The Silkworm” “a genuine mystery with an altogether satisfying resolution.”

“The Silkworm” hits shelves June 19.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.