Amtrak launches writers' residency program

After receiving requests on Twitter, Amtrak has created a program in which writers will be able to ride their trains for free or a low cost, says Amtrak social media director Julia Quinn.

Mike Groll/AP
An Amtrak train travels through New York.

A cozy space with time to write – and no need to pay for that space – is many authors’ dream.

Amtrak may be on the way to providing that.

It all started when writer Alexander Chee mentioned in an interview that one of the best places to write, for him, was on a train. In the interview with Pen America, Chee said, “I wish Amtrak had residencies for writers.”

Writers Zach Seward and Jessica Gross tweeted a link to the article at the Amtrak Twitter account and Amtrak responded to them, writing, “We’d need a test run. You two up for a trip to Chicago and back?” 

So Gross embarked on the journey from New York, which Amtrak offered for free as long as she wrote about her trip on social media and participated in an interview conducted by the company, which was posted on the Amtrak blog.

“We loved the idea,” Amtrak staff wrote on their blog of Chee’s suggestion.

According to the Wire, Amtrak said it will make the “writers’ residency” idea a program.

Gross told the Wire that the idea seems to have caught on with others.

I’ve seen a billion tweets from other writers saying ‘I want one of these,’” she said. Amtrak social media director Julia Quinn agreed, saying that the company has experienced “overwhelming demand.”

And now Chee himself will get to experience a soothing writing experience.

“I can announce my @Amtrak writer's residency dream came true, thanks to them,” he tweeted. “Am set for a trip from NYC-Portland, OR in mid-May.”

Quinn told the Wire that if future writers residency trips aren’t free, the company wants to keep them inexpensive.

She said she doesn’t believe there will be requirements to qualify for the program – for example, needing to be a published author to participate, or only being a creative writer.

“The differences between a journalist, a published author, a blogger – those lines are continually blurred by the Internet,” she said.

What say you, readers? Would you be interested in embarking on a long train ride to get some writing done?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.