Norman Rockwell family calls Deborah Solomon's Rockwell bio 'fiction'

'American Mirror,' Solomon's bio, includes allegations that Rockwell's paintings include homoerotic undertones.

|
Sotheby's/AP
Works by Norman Rockwell include the piece 'Saying Grace.'

His paintings depict such a warm American utopia replete with sweet small-town scenes, tender moments, and flawless family vignettes that Norman Rockwell illustrations have become something of a paragon of perfect domestic happiness. 

But the man behind those blissful scenes lived a far darker life, fraught with anxiety, depression, and loneliness. He was a twice-divorced, thrice-married repressed homosexual who gravitated toward men and boys.

So says Deborah Solomon, author of a new – and very controversial – biography of the famous family man, “American Mirror: The Life and Art of Norman Rockwell.”

The allegations in Solomon’s daring new book have been drawing intense speculation about the man Americans thought they knew. After all, who can resist dark revelations about an icon of American idealism?

They are also drawing objection from Rockwell’s family, who cooperated with Solomon on the book and are calling her claims “false” and “unsubstantiated.”

First, the facts: Rockwell did, indeed, marry three times and father three sons. His first wife left Rockwell for another man, his second suffered from depression and died at age 51, possibly by suicide.

Unlike the paradigm of familial bliss he depicted in his paintings, Rockwell’s relationships with his family members, including his mother, wives, and sons, appeared to have been fraught with difficulty.

Solomon says Rockwell was married to his work at the expense of his family.

He was also a hypochondriac (hence the frequent image of doctors in his art, says Solomon) who later formed a close friendship with his psychiatrist, the famous Freud follower Erik Erikson.

He was an obsessive-compulsive neat freak who rinsed his paintbrushes multiple times a day, washed his paintings with Ivory soap, and scrubbed his studio floors. 

The assertions: Solomon says Rockwell “prefer[ed] male company,” and that “it’s possible to discern enormous homoeroticism as well as a desire to distance himself from his own desires.”

She recounted an episode in which Rockwell went camping in the Adirondacks and shared a bed with his assistant Fred Hildebrandt. The next morning he wrote in his journal, “Fred looked fetching in his pajamas.”

“He was very comfortable around men and he loved male bodies,” Solomon told the Wall Street Journal in an interview, in which she adds that there is no evidence Rockwell actually had physical relationships with men or boys.

Solomon notes that of 322 covers for the Saturday Evening Post, only three of Rockwell’s illustrations depict a traditional portrait of family of parents and at least two children. The majority, she says, feature men and boys. 

As the New York Times notes, she points to homoerotic undertones in paintings like “Sailor Dreaming of a Girlfriend,” “Before the Shot,” and “The Runaway,” which depict two sailors seated close together with one gazing at the other, the bare bottom of a young boy at a doctor’s office, and a beefy policeman seated beside a young boy at a diner counter, respectively. 

Solomon told the WSJ that sexual repression fueled Rockwell’s art. “Repression does wonders for your art,” she said.  “I think a canvas doesn't lie, and I think art does not lie, and whatever was on the canvas was the true Rockwell.”

Solomon also speculates that Rockwell contemplated suicide and threatened to kill himself on at least one occasion.

Still, there are doubts about Solomon’s assertions.

As USA Today points out, this isn’t the first time a “famous dead person” has “retrospectively [been] labeled gay by modern gender theorists.”

Rockwell’s family, which cooperated with Solomon on the book, says her assertions are largely false.

“Ms. Solomon's book does not give a scholarly or factual account of Norman Rockwell's life and work,” the Norman Rockwell Family Agency said in a statement. “Rather she concocts a fictionalized life. In doing so, she attempts to falsify all that the Family and the world know about him. In unfounded claims of homosexuality, Ms. Solomon obsessively attempts to demonstrate her 'logical' evolution to pedophilia with not a shred of evidence apart from her unsupportable conjectures. She consistently pretends to know how Norman Rockwell 'felt' and what 'impulses' he harbored when there is no basis for such speculation, in her book or elsewhere.”

It continued, “The Rockwell Family fully cooperated with Ms. Solomon with complete transparency and trust in her quest to create the authoritative work on Norman Rockwell. Chronologically and factually, she seriously misinterprets, omits important material, makes many factual errors, and fictionalizes incidents…. The Family now feels that her purpose in befriending us and writing this fictionalized account was publicity, financial gain and self-aggrandizement.”

The Rockwell are certainly not the first family to be dismayed by a biographic portrayal of their loved one. In fact the Rockwell story is somewhat reminiscent of the controversy over "Schulz and Peanuts," David Michaelis's 2007 biography of cartoonist Charles Schulz. The Schulz's children initially cooperated with Michaelis – offering Michaelis access to private papers, as did the Rockwell family with Sololmon – but were ultimately dismayed by his portrait of their father as depressed, melancholic, and a cold and absent parent.

In the case of Rockwell, it's hard to argue with Solomon's statement that "whatever was on the canvas was the true Rockwell." But it's also true that the artist himself is the only one truly equipped to give us an accurate read of his own art. All the rest of us – skilled biographers and loved family members alike – can never really do better than guess.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Norman Rockwell family calls Deborah Solomon's Rockwell bio 'fiction'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2013/1204/Norman-Rockwell-family-calls-Deborah-Solomon-s-Rockwell-bio-fiction
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe