Louisiana residents choose libraries over jail to receive funds

Residents of Lafourche Parish in Louisiana recently voted down a proposal that would have used money currently going to local libraries to build a new prison.

Ann Hermes
Libraries in Louisiana's Lafourche Parish will continue to receive funding after a proposal to divert money from the libraries to build a new jail did not pass. Here, various titles are on display in a New York library.

Residents of a Louisiana parish recently voted to keep funding going to local libraries rather than use the library funds to build a new jail.

In Lafourche Parish, a measure suggesting that property tax money that had been used to fund public libraries should be diverted to construct a new prison was put to vote last weekend.

Voters in the parish decided the libraries should keep the money, with 56 percent rejecting the measure, according to Lafourche Parish newspaper The Daily Comet (Only 15 percent of eligible voters cast a ballot on the issue).

Library director Laura Sanders told the Daily Comet she and other library workers are “very happy with the results.”

“We tried very hard to get the word out that losing this funding would affect the libraries and our daily operations,” Sanders said. If the libraries had lost the funding from the tax, the library system would have lost 11 percent of its total funding, according to Daily Comet writer Jacob Batte.

The debate over this regional vote ended up making national headlines when Lafourche Paris Council Chair Lindel Toups, a proponent of diverting the funding to a new prison, told the Tri-Parish Times newspaper that he believed libraries didn’t need all the funding they received and that “they’re teaching Mexicans how to speak English," referring to a Spanish-language area in one of the branches. According to the Daily Comet, Toups has since recanted the statement.

Despite the election results, many in the area do agree that something needs to be done about the current prison. According to Batte, an unnamed consultant who looked at the parish jail said it is “in the worst condition of any jail he's seen.” Lafourche Parish president Charlotte Randolph said the poor state of the prison means the federal government may soon take action.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.