Salman Rushdie: The trouble with first person

Bestselling author Salman Rushdie shares his thoughts on writing, living in hiding, and the subjectivity of freedom.

Andrew Winning/Reuters/File
Author Salman Rushdie poses for a photograph after an interview with Reuters in central London.

The problem with memoirs written in first person is that “the character called ‘I’ feels different than all the ‘He’s’ and ‘She’s,’ ” Salman Rushdie told a packed house at Old South Church in Boston’s Copley Square during his keynote address for the 2013 Boston Book Festival this weekend.

At least that’s the conclusion he came to after wrestling with his first draft of his new book "Joseph Anton: A Memoir," released in paperback in September. 

Frustrated, he approached his agent and explained that the book just wasn’t coming along. “He told me what any good agent will tell you, 'Shut up and keep writing.' "

So Mr. Rushdie returned to his keyboard with a new tack. He said that as soon as he swapped out his I’s for he’s, the book began to unfold naturally. He felt that the perspective shift helped him to tell his story more “novelistically,” and made the character more fallible than an omniscient first person ever could.

“Nobody wants to read a 600 page book in which the author is fabulous throughout,” he said.

Perhaps there is another reason that the third person felt so appropriate for this book. In a way, Rushdie lived several years of his life in the third person.

In 1989, Rushdie learned from a BBC journalist that the Ayatolla Khomeni had sentenced him to death. His crime: publishing a novel that the Ayatolla deemed “against Islam, the Prophet, and the Quran.”

Rushdie explained to the rapt crowd that he had never intended to insult the Ayatolla and had never considered that he would ever even read the book.

From that moment, Rushdie’s – and his family’s – life completely changed. He abandoned his home, his name (while in hiding Rushdie published under the pseudonym Joseph Anton), and his independence in exchange for protection from the City of London Police.

While Rushdie said that he appreciated the security that his guards offered him, he felt imprisoned. The home they gave him was not his home. His choices were no longer his alone, as he now had to run his daily itinerary by Scotland Yard.

In many ways that life was not his own, but that of Joseph Anton.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Salman Rushdie: The trouble with first person
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today