Man Booker Prize winner: 5 surprising things about Eleanor Catton's victory

Writer Eleanor Catton took the Man Booker Prize for her novel 'The Luminaries.'

Joel Ryan/Invision/AP
The Man Booker Prize was won by Eleanor Catton for her book 'The Luminaries.'

Author Eleanor Catton captured the 2013 Man Booker Prize in a year in which judges were praised for selecting a diverse roster of nominees.

New Zealand's Catton, who won for her book “The Luminaries,” beat out well-known authors such as Jhumpa Lahiri, who was nominated for her novel “The Lowlands," and "Harvest" writer Jim Crace, who was thought to be the frontrunner, according to the Telegraph.

Robert MacFarlane, the chairman of the judges’ panel, called Catton’s book “extraordinarily gripping” in a statement.

“We read it three times and each time we dug into it the yields were extraordinary, its dividends astronomical,” he said. 

Catton herself is an out-of-the-ordinary winner for the prize. Here are five surprises connected with her victory:

1. Catton is the youngest writer ever to capture the prize at 28, with writer Ben Okri previously holding that title after winning at age 32 in 1991 for his book “The Famished Road.” 

Last year’s Booker Prize, which was won by writer Hilary Mantel for her book “Bring Up the Bodies,” was also a year in which a record was set – Mantel became the first British author and first female writer to win the prize twice.

2. Catton is only the second author from New Zealand to take the Booker, with Kiwi writer Keri Hulme having secured the prize in 1985 for her novel “The Bone People.”

3. Catton's novel, which clocked in at 848 pages, is also the longest book ever to be named the Man Booker Prize winner.

Catton told the Guardian that she almost didn’t realize how long her book was during the writing process.

“It's a curious thing about writing a novel – you never see it until it's finished,” she said. “When I was nearing the end I started to get a sense that when I pressed save on my Word document, it took an awfully long time.”

4. “The Luminaries” has a particularly dense plot.

The novel takes place in New Zealand during the 1800s and is a complicated mystery, divided into twelve portions modeled after the Zodiac. In her acceptance speech, Catton noted that her novel is “a publisher’s nightmare.” Washington Post critic Chris Bohjalian called the book is “a reviewer’s nightmare." Bohjalian added: "I say this not because I didn’t like it; trust me, I did. You will, also. But it is astoundingly complicated and almost defies explanation. Moreover, I can’t recall the last time I read a novel that left me so baffled. In the end, however, I was awed.”

5. Catton seems very open to the new rules governing next year’s Man Booker Prize competition.

Beginning in 2014, American writers will also be allowed to compete for the first time ever, with any novel that is written in English and released in Britain being eligible for the award. (Check out our article on the controversy here.) 

Crace (who had previously said, “There’s something in there that you would lose if you open it up to American author”) reaffirmed his doubts about the coming change asking, after the announcement of Catton's victory, “Will a young woman published in New Zealand stand much of a chance again?”, according to Reuters.

However, Catton herself seemed all for the change.

“I think it's a really great thing that finally we've got a prize that is an English-language prize that doesn't make a distinction for writers who are writing from a particular country,” she said, according to Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.