'American Psycho' sequel could come to FX

FX has put an 'American Psycho' sequel into development, which would center on protagonist Patrick Bateman and his new student.

'American Psycho' starred Christian Bale.

FX is developing a TV sequel series to the 2000 film “American Psycho,” which starred Christian Bale and was based on the Bret Easton Ellis novel of the same name.

The original story took place in the 1980s and centered on Patrick Bateman, an investment banker who was also a murderer. The TV show would be set many years after the original movie and would center on Patrick, now in his 50s, taking on a student “who will become every bit his equal,” according to FX.

The script will be written by Stefan Jaworski.

No word on whether Bale will return as Patrick.

Upon its publication, the novel met with controversy because of its content and its sales are restricted in some other countries such as Australia, where it can only be sold to people over 18.

“American Psycho” also starred Willem Dafoe, Reese Witherspoon, and Chloe Sevigny and was well-received critically. However, Ellis said of the film, “American Psycho was a book I didn’t think needed to be turned into a movie… I think the problem with American Psycho was that it was conceived as… a literary work with a very unreliable narrator at the center of it and the medium of film demands answers.”

A sequel to the original film, titled “American Psycho 2: All American Girl,” was released in 2002 and starred Mila Kunis as a murderous student who wants to become the assistant for her college class. In “Girl,” actor Michael Kremko took on the role of Patrick.

The book has also been adapted into a musical with music and lyrics by “Spring Awakening” composer Duncan Sheik, which is set to premiere in London this December.

FX is currently the home of shows such as “American Horror Story,” “Sons of Anarchy,” and “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” and was also behind past programs including “Nip/Tuck,” “The Shield,” and “Rescue Me.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.