Oxford English Dictionary adds the words 'tweet,' 'e-book'

The OED bent the rules slightly by adding 'tweet' in under 10 years – a nod to the word's rapid and widespread rise into everyday usage.

Nati Harnik/AP
Investor Warren Buffett sends out his first tweet using a tablet device.

The Oxford English Dictionary is one of the most respected dictionaries in the world. It is no empty boast when the book's publisher calls it the “definitive record of the English language.”

So what has made the cut for the edition of the online version of the dictionary (which is updated four times a year)? According to Oxford University, the words “tweet” and “e-reader,” among others, are now official parts of our lexicon.

Other words that made the cut this time around include “crowdsourcing,” the verb form of “stream” (as in “streaming a video on your laptop”), and the expression “to have a cow,” which the Oxford English Dictionary chief editor John Simpson notes in his post “is often associated with the character Bart from the animated series 'The Simpsons,' but it is much older than the television show.” The OED says the phrase originated in 1959.

According to Simpson, the inclusion of the word “tweet” in the OED meant bending the dictionary’s rules. Usually, he wrote, “a new word needs to be current for ten years before consideration for inclusion.”

“But it seems to be catching on,” Simpson noted in what seems a bit of an understatement.

Other words or phrases that have made the cut in the past include “OMG” and “LOL,” both of which were added to the dictionary in 2011. The online version of the dictionary has new entries added to it by editors every three months.

The OED was first printed in 1884 and a second edition of the dictionary was released in 1989. A third edition has been in the works for some time, but Nigel Portwood, chief executive of the Oxford University Press, told the Telegraph in 2010 that he doesn’t believe it will be printed in physical form since the online version of the OED is now so popular.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.