Self-published books triple in production since 2006

Self-published books make up 43 percent of the print titles released in 2011 and helped to drive the first growth in print production since 2007, according to a new study from Bowker.

Bella Andre/PR Newswire
Writer Bella Andre's self-published book 'Let Me Be The One' made it to the twentieth spot on the list of New York Times bestselling e-book fiction for the week of Sept. 30.

The production of self-published books has almost tripled since 2006, according to a new study released by Bowker.

“Self-publishing is now supported by a sophisticated and highly accessible support structure,” Beat Barblan, director of identifier services for Bowker, said in a statement. “This is no longer just vanity presses at work – self-publishing is out of the dark corners and making its way into the mainstream.”

The number of books – including both print and e-books – published by the author has increased by 287 percent since 2006. When it comes to print books alone, self-published books made up 43 percent of the titles published in 2011. Altogether, more than 235,000 print and e-book self-published titles came out last year.

With self-published books making up 43 percent of the print titles released in 2011, they helped drive the first growth in print production since 2007, according to the Bowker data.

What happens to all these self-published books, one may wonder? Do they mostly end up in boxes in the authors' garages? Not necessarily. Self-published author M. Leighton’s e-book “Down to You” made it to No. 8 on The New York Times e-book fiction bestseller list for the week of Oct. 28, while Teresa Mummert’s “White Trash Beautiful,” also self-published, made it to No. 27 on Oct. 14. Earlier this fall, Kelly Favor’s self-released e-book “His Every Touch” was No. 26 on the Oct. 7 list, while “Let Me Be The One” by Bella Andre, also self-published, was No. 20 the week of Sept. 23.  "Easy" by Tammara Webber was at No. 35 the same week.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.