E-readers are most popular in ... Kentucky?

The college town of Lexington, Ky. is the US city in which e-readers are the most popular, according to a new study by The Atlantic.

Brian Snyder/Reuters
Lexington, Ky.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Anchorage, Alaska, all beat out cities such as New York, Boston, and Los Angeles in The Atlantic's rankings of e-reader popularity.

A study conducted by The Atlantic magazine analyzed the cities in which e-readers were most popular – and the results may not be what you’d expect.

According to the data collected by the magazine, e-readers are most popular in the city of Lexington, Ky., followed by Ann Arbor, Mich. in second place and Anchorage, Alaska in third.

The Atlantic reached their findings by examining the Priceonomics database to see the electronics sales in each city. Results were then judged on what percent of total items for sale were electronic readers. According to The Atlantic, they determined their results using sales figures for Amazon's Kindle e-reader. They also checked on data on sales of the Nook, the e-reader sold by Barnes and Noble, but, according to the magazine, that data did not change the results they reached.

Kindles in Lexington accounted for almost 0.40% of total items for sale in the city, while Ann Arbor and Anchorage both appeared to come close to 0.36%.

Madison, Wis. took the third spot, with Washington, D.C. coming in fifth. New York City didn’t come into the rankings until spot number 16, and Boston only made number 42. Philadelphia was ranked at number 21, and Los Angeles was near the bottom of the list at number 87 out of 94. Fresco, Calif. came in at the last spot.

As noted by The Atlantic, Lexington, Ann Arbor, and Madison are all college towns with large populations of students.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.