Figment lets young writers share and critique work

Figment is a website that gives teenagers and young adults a forum for posting their work and giving advice to others.

Figment allows users to post their own original writing and seek comments from others.

You’re a teenager writing a novella or poem. You dot that last "i," cross the final "t" – and then what?

Some middle and high schools have creative writing classes, but not all of them. And as any writer knows, feedback is key to improving a manuscript.

So writer Dana Goodyear and Jeff Lewis, managing editor of former business magazine Portfolio, founded Figment, a writing site for teens and young adults to post their writing and receive feedback. Created in December 2010, it’s been skyrocketing in popularity, with more than 200,000 users currently registered.  Last December, the site published its first print book, titled “Dream School” by Blake Nelson.

“Young writers want a place to experiment, to take a risk and get a response," Goodyear told the Los Angeles Times. “To have that daring feeling of putting themselves out there.”

Most users are between 13 and 17, according to site data, but some skew a little older. Users can form groups on the website, and some are apparently created at the behest of teachers for a class, with titles like “Mrs. Klopp’s Second Period Poets.” Other groups have specific interests, like one created for those who want to participate in an online role-playing wolf game.

There are also contests on the site. One, for instance, asks users to write a chapter (based on the book “Grave Mercy” by Robin LaFevers) about a character who is lying about his or her identity. And of course there are forums which are divided into sections like “Fanfiction,” “Writing scraps” (for works which have a plot but no characters), and “Full-length stories.” Other forums aren’t strictly about writing but more for general discussion, like “From Gaga to Godfather,” which encourages users to talk about pop culture. And then there's also an aptly named “General/random” forum.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Figment lets young writers share and critique work
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today