JFK assassination: Did Castro know before it happened?

In 'Castro's Secrets,' a former CIA analyst claims that Fidel Castro was aware that the Kennedy assassination would be attempted before it happened.

Antonio Milena
In his book, Latell says that early on Nov. 22, 1963, Castro told a Cuban intelligence officer to listen to any radio communications coming from Texas.

A new book by a former CIA analyst is claiming that Fidel Castro knew that the assassination of John F. Kennedy would take place.

“Castro’s Secrets: The CIA and Cuba’s Intelligence Machine” by Brian Latell, who was formerly the national intelligence officer for Latin America for the CIA and who currently serves as the senior research associate at the University of Miami’s Institute for Cuban and Cuban American Studies, uses formerly classified documents from the Pentagon, FBI and CIA. “Secrets” also includes interviews from former Cuban spies.

“Everything I write is backed up by documents and on-the-record sources,” Latell said in an interview with The Miami Herald. “There’s virtually no speculation. I don’t say Fidel Castro ordered the assassination, I don’t say Oswald was under his control. He might have been, but I don’t argue that, because I was unable to find any evidence for that.”

In his book, Latell makes the claim that Castro knew of the assassination beforehand with evidence from Florentino Aspillaga, a former member of Cuba’s intelligence service. According to Latell’s book, Aspillaga, who usually did surveillance of the radio communications of the CIA, was told on Nov. 22, 1963 to instead listen to any radio communications coming from Texas. Aspillaga said he was confused but did so, and was flabbergasted to hear the news of Kennedy’s assassination hours later.

“Castro knew,” Aspillaga told a CIA debriefer, according to Latell’s book. “They knew Kennedy would be killed.”

In his book, Latell discusses recordings taken by the CIA inside the Cuban embassy that showed Cuban intelligence officers talking about Oswald with details about him that were relatively unknown at the time and had not yet been given to any newspapers.

Kennedy’s assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was known to sympathize with Cuba and held public demonstrations in support of Castro. At several points, he applied for a visa to travel to Cuba, but was refused the documents. After the assassination, Castro said, “We never in our life heard of him” in a speech, but according to Latell’s book, Oswald visiting the Cuban embassy was big news in Cuba, and Castro would certainly have heard about it.

In Latell’s book, an FBI spy named Jack Childs told the FBI that after being refused a visa to travel to Cuba by workers at the Cuban embassy, Oswald left angrily, saying, “I’m going to kill Kennedy for this.”

“Secrets” also claims that Cuban Rolando Cubela, who worked with the CIA, was actually a double agent.

Latell’s book will be released April 24.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.