'The Islamic Jesus' seeks commonalities between Christianity, Judaism, Islam

Turkish journalist Mustafa Akyol presses his case about just how relevant Jesus is to his faith today.

The Islamic Jesus: How the King of the Jews Became a Prophet of the Muslims By Mustafa Akyol St. Martin's Press 288 pp.

In a world rife with religious tensions at home and abroad, a new and thoughtful book proclaims some good news: There is much that Christianity, Judaism, and Islam share. For starters, all three worship the God of Abraham. This is not breaking news, of course, but author Mustafa Akyol makes the most of this and other commonalities.

The author, who is a Turkish journalist, began his theological odyssey early in this century, on the streets of his home city of Istanbul, when a Christian missionary greeted him and handed him a Bible. That night he began reading it and was struck by how much of it was consistent with his own Islamic faith.

He went so far as to underline passages he liked in blue and those he didn’t in red. Blue won out, although he found the epistles of Paul, and the Christian tenet that Jesus is divine – rather than a human prophet, as he is viewed in both Islam and Judaism – rough sledding.

Akyol much prefers the writing of James, whom some scholars identify as Jesus’ brother. Paul, who was instrumental in the early spread of Christianity, never met Jesus in the flesh; he is said to have encountered the resurrected messiah on the road to Damascus.

Later, when the author shared a particularly favorite passage from the Book of James with his Quranic study group, he was asked, “Are you sure this is from the Christian Bible?”

In his second book, The Islamic Jesus: How the King of the Jews Became a Prophet of the Muslims, Akyol presses his case about just how relevant Jesus is to his faith today. He saves the best for last and his scriptural circumlocutions along the way can test a lay reader at times. Not only do Pharisees, prophets, and angels abound, but also Sadducees, Essenes, Herodians, Zealots, Sicarii (“daggermen”), Socinians, Judaizing Christians, Christian Jews, etc. All are divinely inspired, of course.

Still, the pilgrimage is worth it and provides valuable insights into the Gordian knot that relations between religions can become. The author is a moderate Muslim who is deeply concerned – as are many Christians, Jews, atheists and others – about what he calls his faith’s “grim malaise.”

He likens modern Islamic Jihadists to the first-century Jewish sect known as the Zealots, who employed violence and political assassination to battle Roman occupation. Their terror tactics only served to intensify Roman repression, the author points out, while the peaceful approach of Pauline Christianity not only won over the empire eventually, but also spread the faith throughout much of the world. Some 2.2 billion people, nearly one third of the earth’s population, are Christians.      

Akyol also writes about times when relations between Jews and Muslims were better. For example, pagan and later Christian Rome banned Jews from Jerusalem, but when Muslims captured it in 637 they welcomed them back into the holy city.

At times, the author’s insights are unintentional. He describes a news photo that he received via email in 2004 from a friend – an image that went viral throughout the Muslin world – showing American Marines lounging in a mosque in Iraq in full battle gear, including their combat boots. They had just ousted insurgents from the building and were likely unaware, Akyol surmises, that wearing shoes in a mosque was highly offensive to Muslims. 

He writes of the incident: “[T]he problem was not that these American soldiers intentionally insulted Muslims. It was that they were conquerors of a people whom they did not know and whose profound sense of the sacred they did not understand.” What Akyol doesn’t address here is the propriety of Muslim fighters using a sacred mosque like a bunker or an armory, to fire from and be fired upon. Inevitable questions arise from his selective outrage: Who defamed the holy place first, and which was the greater sacrilege? 

Meanwhile, back to Jesus. One wonders what many of the author’s coreligionists will think of his thesis that the teachings of Jesus are crucial if Muslims are to find their way in a fractious world. In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus is reported to have said to the Pharisees that the coming of the kingdom of God is not a physical place, but rather “the kingdom of God is within you.”

Toward the end of the book Akyol urges Muslims to view the longed for Caliphate in like fashion: “Hence it is possible for Muslims today to abandon the commitment to the Caliphate as a political entity, but strive to be better caliphs on earth – as individuals with God-given faculties and responsibilities. It is possible for Muslims to think, in other words, that the Caliphate is not here or there, but within themselves.”

It is a brave commentary. There are some, of course, who will interpret it as blasphemy.

Editor's note: The first paragraph of this review was edited to better state the common ground shared by Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.