'A Colony in a Nation' describes a colony of the unfree within the US

Journalist Chris Hayes argues that some US politicians and law enforcement officials act as if whole areas of America constitute a separate realm of less value where different rules apply.

A Colony in a Nation By Chris Hayes W. W. Norton & Co 256 pp.

The title of journalist Chris Hayes’s new book, A Colony in a Nation, comes from a phrase that Richard Nixon used in a 1968 speech at the Republican National Convention. “Black Americans,” he said, “do not want more government programs which perpetuate dependency. They don’t want to be a colony in a nation.” Hayes argues that in the half-century since Nixon’s speech, white America has subjugated a colony of the unfree within its own borders.

He differs quite sharply from Nixon in his assessment of how exactly this colony was created. Hayes sees danger not in dependence on social welfare programs, but in the replacement of those programs with militarized police tactics. “Black people asked for social investment and got SWAT teams, asked for full employment and got gang units, asked for protection and got ‘stop and frisk,’” he writes.

Hayes quotes a police sergeant in Baltimore who instructs his officers: “Do not treat criminals like citizens.” He also cites a DOJ report on patterns of discrimination in policing in Cleveland, where a large sign hanging in a district station identified the police station as a “forward operating base,” a term for a secure outpost that supports tactical operations in a war zone. That some police officers think of the areas they patrol as violent foreign countries occupied by criminals shows that the Nation-Colony framework is not just a metaphor. Some politicians and law enforcement officials act as if whole areas of America constitute a separate realm where the locals’ lives are worth less and different rules apply to those who govern them.

A broad range of evidence supports the idea that black and white Americans do not enjoy equal rights and protections. The homicide rate for white Americans is 2.5 per 100,000, while for African-Americans the rate is almost 20 per 100,000. “For white Americans, lethal violence is nearly as rare as it is in Finland; for black Americans, it’s nearly as common as it is in Mexico,” Hayes writes. In some cities, the contrast is even more dramatic. The murder rate on the poor and predominantly black South Side of Chicago is 9000% higher than on the city’s prosperous and largely white North Side. To say that these different worlds are both equal parts of a single country is a fiction.

Black and white Americans also have vastly different experiences with the criminal justice system. Hayes puts it like this: “If you live in the Nation, the criminal justice system functions like your laptop’s operating system, quietly humming in the background, doing what it needs to do to allow you to be your most efficient, functional self. In the Colony, the system functions like a computer virus, it intrudes constantly, it interrupts your life at the most inconvenient times, and it does this as a matter of course. The disruption itself is normal.”

A huge body of statistics and research by criminologists shows the systematic racial bias in enforcement of laws and sentencing for crimes in America. Hayes cites this data, but he also draws on anecdotes to make this point even more vivid. He was caught with a small quantity of marijuana as a college student, for instance, but the officers gave him a pass. He interviews various young black men in Baltimore who were not so fortunate.

Of course for residents of the Nation, it’s easy to forget that the Colony even exists. The euphemistic language of “good schools” and “bad schools,” “rough neighborhoods” and “nice neighborhoods,” make these qualities sound intrinsic, even geographic, like “coastal” and “inland” regions. Using the terms “colonizers” and “colonized” emphasizes that there is nothing natural or unchangeable about the current state of affairs – colonies can be captured and controlled, just as they can rise up and seek their own liberation. Whether this is regarded as legitimate protest against unlawful occupiers or unlawful disobedience that threatens the social order largely depends on whether you accept the Colony-Nation paradigm.

Americans have good historical reasons for sympathizing with the colonized. The American Revolution, after all, was fought to overthrow British rule, and its immediate impetus was unfair taxation and arbitrary searches of individuals and seizures of goods. Hayes makes a provocative case that many police departments today resemble the British just before the American Revolution: cops in Ferguson, for instance, sought to boost municipal revenue by writing as many tickets as possible, however trivial the offenses. The British, broke after the Seven Years’ War, sought to replenish their coffers by aggressive enforcement of all tax and tariff laws in the American colonies.

Hayes is a forceful and eloquent writer, and this book deserves close attention by a broad readership. He offers a clear and useful framework for understanding the current dysfunctions of American society. It’s a brilliant diagnosis, and the necessary treatments – more spending on social programs, the de-militarization of the police, gradual changes to the conscious attitudes and unconscious biases of millions of Americans – are more urgent than ever.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'A Colony in a Nation' describes a colony of the unfree within the US
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today