'Inherit the Dust' offers startling images to remind us of the threats to wildlife

A wildlife advocate's photos ask: Where do the cheetahs play?

Inherit the Dust By Nick Brandt Edwynn Houk Editions 124 pp.

The best wildlife photographers capture images of exotic creatures that go beyond documentation to become art. Nick Brandt is one such photographer.  His books are filled with stunning images of cheetahs, lions, elephants – the large beasts of East Africa – in all their glory, printed in powerful high-contrast black and white. They are portraits, devoid of place. The reader can admire the gorilla, safe in the confines of its photo frame. But Brandt’s point is that they are not safe.

A talented and passionate advocate for wildlife and wild places, Brandt has spent his career educating people about the destruction of animal habitats and the loss of these irreplaceable beings facing extinction. His latest book, Inherit the Dust, makes his case in a brilliant way. Brandt made life-size prints of his animals and placed them in trash dumps or cities, places where the natural world has been altered by development and destruction. The king of beasts, his mane blowing in the breeze, looks out over a rock quarry, his natural habitat a wasteland. Two rhinos face a railroad track. A giraffe stands with its back to a factory.

The juxtapositions are startling. We are face to face with the destruction of something precious. We are impelled to realize that where we sit now, animals used to live. Brandt reminds us that it’s not too late to stop the environmental degradation of what remains of the places these gazelles, big cats, and primates call home. We can change course, saving what remains so African children aren’t someday sitting where the leopard and zebra once roamed.
Melanie Stetson Freeman is a Monitor staff photographer.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.