Garry Winogrand

The lifework of Garry Winograd is also a personal commentary on three decades of life in America.

Garry Winogrand, edited by Leo Rubenfien, Yale University Press, 448 pp.

For years, every time I came across a Garry Winogrand (1928-84) photo, I would become mesmerized by the energy in each frame. How could a seemingly spontaneous moment contain so much power? I picked up Garry Winogrand, edited by Leo Rubinfien, hoping for an answer.

Winogrand was born in the Bronx to immigrant parents. His formative years coincided with the ascent of America as a superpower, and – just as important – the rise of photo magazines, which provided Winogrand with not only a source of income but also with an arena in which to develop his eye. 

Winogrand’s New York of the 1950s does not show the aftermath of the Depression, or the struggles of the immigrant class that he comes from. Instead, his New York is a midtown Manhattan full of strivers, whose energy drives a new booming postwar economy. The book takes us through three decades of Winogrand’s work. In the expansive introductory text, Rubinfien asserts that Winogrand is the least studied of his famous peers: Diane Arbus, Robert Frank, and Lee Friedlander.

The text frames the work, and life, of Winogrand from the perspective of a close observer. It explains that Winogrand at first pursued the humanist vision of the ’50s, best encapsulated by the Museum of Modern Art’s “Family of Man” exhibition in New York – an exhibit which included one of Winogrand's images.

Rubinfien suggests that Winogrand became an “author” when he encountered the work of Walker Evans and, later, Frank’s “The Americans.” Starting in the 1960s, his work took a more overtly personal tone in its commentary. As Winogrand earned a couple of Guggenheim grants, he pursued his goal of traveling the United States, free to investigate his vision, which seems to have become less and less optimistic with the passage of time.

As for my early desire to understand the energy of Winogrand’s images, it has become clear to me that their power comes from a certain disregard for composition, a peculiar sense of timing, and most important, a talent for translating ideas into images. His images are loaded with signs that unfold differently for each viewer, yet they remain faithful to his view of America. Winogrand’s work is not about the people in the images, but about his perception of America in a time of great turmoil.

The Winogrand images presented in this collection feel like the work of a man who has stayed late at a party that went on for much too long. They start with a sense of order and optimism and close with chaos and some regret.

The book is a companion to a retrospective exhibition at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, which will travel around the world over the next few years. 

Alfredo Sosa is the Monitor’s photo editor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Garry Winogrand
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today