The Heir Apparent, by Jane Ridley, Random House, 752 pp.

The Heir Apparent

This may be the definitive biography of Britain's Edward VII – a man who grew from spoiled prince to beloved monarch.

If there is a single defining characteristic of Americans as a people, it may be a commonly held belief in the malleability of fate and character that lets the least amongst us rise to the highest of heights through effort, reform, and persistence. And although this is antithetical to the hidebound order of the European court system, this appealing redemption story lies at the heart of The Heir Apparent: A Life of Edward VII, The Playboy Prince, the story of the Prince of Wales who rose from rotten beginnings to an exhilarating turn as monarch of Great Britain.
The kingship of Albert "Bertie" Edward – eventually Edward VII – seemed to be a disaster in the making. Viewed as feeble-minded during his childhood, Bertie grew to become a caddish young man known for his seductive letters to (often married) young women, and his penchant for raising Cain. In his wake, he left scandal, debts, and the occasional shame-fueled suicide.
The trouble didn't come from nowhere. Much of the narrative oomph in "The Heir Apparent" comes from a lively deconstruction of the relationship between Bertie's mom (the manipulative, perpetually grieving, and often withdrawn Queen Victoria) and the troubled crown prince. Here's Victoria talking to her daughter Vicky about Bertie's wife Princess Alexandra (Alix) and the prospect of grandchildren: "Are you aware," Victoria asked Vicky, "that Alix has the smallest head ever seen? I dread that – with [Bertie's] small empty brain – very much for future children."

But as it turned out, Edward VII's qualities – tolerance, diplomacy, a worldly interest in other people and places, a deft common touch – led him to become a surprisingly able monarch who helped to lay the groundwork for the modern, media-sensitive monarchy.... for better or worse.
The book's subtitle – "A Life of Edward VII, The Playboy Prince" – is too modest by half. If this 726-page, meticulously researched dreadnought of a book isn't THE definitive life story of this fascinating figure of British history, then nothing ever will be.
Historian Jane Ridley's efforts have yielded an imposing work. Fortunately, Ridley's talents are twofold: first, in finding masses of interesting information, and second, in rendering them in lively, engaging ways that make "The Heir Apparent" feel less like a swampy slog and much more like an elegant waltz.
Ridley chooses her battles carefully. The book exists in a quaint sort of bubble evocative of the royal lifestyle – nothing of the modern (from pop culture to meditations on the current state of the royal family) creeps into its hermetically sealed world. At times this is frustrating. As often as you might detect parallels to the forever-in-waiting Prince Charles or the public pageant that was the life and death of Princess Di, for example, you won't get explanation or context from the author.
Indeed, the general state of public welfare or politics is rarely explored beyond its impact on the royals that are the subjects of this book, which enhances the trapped-in-bubble feeling that readers may experience while making their way through its pages.
This isn't to say that Ridley wears rose-colored glasses while assessing Bertie's world. Death comes often to the princes, queens, and court hangers-on that stuff the pages of "The Heir Apparent," and wealth and royalty provide little-to-no protection from dying young. The immensely fleeting nature of life in Victorian times and the difficult-to-predict ups and downs of fortune are two of the themes that give "The Heir Apparent" its sense of gravity. Had Edward VII died while middle-aged, he would have likely been remembered as a wastrel and rapscallion. Only by surviving to ascend the throne did his finer qualities become evident to all.
And while the royals are the alpha and the omega of "The Heir Apparent," it must be noted that because so much statecraft of the era was person-to-person – involving the marriages of the royals, their prejudices, their, religions and their failings – Ridley manages to capture a lot of interesting historical tides (and the seeds of many a war) in the dragnet.
And at the center of it all, the story of one man, from start to finish, including a suitably dramatic close. After Edward VII's death following nine years on the throne, the public lined up in a queue twelve-wide and seven miles long waiting for a glimpse of the body lying in state at Westminster Hall:
"Never in recorded history, boomed the Times, had the death of a sovereign caused such wide and impressive manifestations of sorrow. The crowds were bigger than at Queen Victoria's funeral, and the public sorrow deeper. Bertie, the dissipated, self-indulgent Prince of Wales, had somehow transformed himself into the father of the nation."

James Norton is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to The Heir Apparent
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today