10 baseball books to usher in the 2017 season

From Leo Durocher to analytics, here are excerpts from 10 books aimed at baseball fans.

4. ‘Home Team,’ by Robert F. Garratt

Playing in their beautiful ballpark at the edge of an urban marina, the San Francisco Giants have emerged as a baseball powerhouse in recent years. But looking back over the team’s complete history in the Bay Area, where it moved from New York in 1957, the history has probably had more valleys than peaks. In fact, author Robert Garratt emphasizes that it’s been a “turbulent” history, which has included two near-moves away from California and the Giants’ former stadium, often-cold and windy Candlestick Park. The story of the Giants in San Francisco is not only that of a leader in signing Latino players, and the first Japanese player in the Major Leagues, but of the owners, politicians, and businessmen who played roles in the franchise’s beyond-the-diamond history.

Here’s an excerpt from Home Team:

“While Candlestick Park fell considerably short of the stately pleasure dome that [team owner Horace] Stoneham had hoped for, his Giants prospered there during the 1960s. In their first ten years in San Francisco the team drew well at the gate, averaging 1.3 million fans a year. It was for good reason: the Giants were phenomenally successful on the field, winning more games in the decade than any other National League team. While they had only one pennant to show for their efforts, they were competitive in every pennant race during that period, finishing second five times. In consecutive years, 1965 and 1966, they lost out in the last days of the season – both times to their bitter rivals, the Dodgers – stoking fan interest but also frustration. During their first ten years in San Francisco, the Giants might have been termed the greatest team never to win a world championship.”

4 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.