12 really good new sports books

Here's a grab bag of a dozen new sports books.

12. 'Fight for Old DC: George Preston Marshall, the Integration of the Washington Redskins, and the Rise of a New NFL,’ by Andrew O’Toole

Long before the current controversy over the team’s nickname, the Washington Redskins had a reputation as foot-draggers in integrating the team’s roster. Even as the 1960s began, the franchise was the only one among the major professional leagues for football, basketball, and baseball not to have a single black player. This was a pivotal period in the NFL’s growth, however, so “Fight for Old DC” examines how the league’s commissioner and Congress applied pressure on Redskins owner George Preston Marshall to finally relent and make Bobby Mitchell the team’s first black player in 1962. 

Here’s an excerpt from Fight for Old DC:

“‘I have no racial policy,’ George Preston Marshall claimed with great authority. ‘I hire Negroes in many capacities.’

“On the surface Marshall’s claims seemed ridiculous. His entire professional football team, the Washington Redskins, was notoriously ‘lily-white.’ And never before had Marshall’s hiring practices been under more scrutiny. A month earlier Marshall had been issued a very public warning from the secretary of the interior to either desegregate his football team or not be allowed the use of the brand-new, government-owned DC Stadium. Upon receiving Stewart L. Udall’s letter of March 24, Marshall’s immediate instinct was to cede the chore of responding to his lawyers. However, before twenty-four hours had passed, Marshall had begun a campaign to state his case. A phone call with Wendell Smith was only the latest attempt by Marshall.

“Smith was a veteran reporter with the Pittsburgh Courier and one of the foremost black sportswriters in the country.”

12 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.