Football 2016: a sideline full of 10 new books

Those who like to huddle over a good football read have quite a roster to choose from this fall.

4. 'Bullet Bill Dudley: The Greatest 60-Minute Man in Football,’ by Steve Stinson

Before the advent of specialization in football, it was common for a player to play on both sides of the ball – offense and defense – and sometimes even to be a triple threat by kicking or returning kicks. “Bullet” Bill Dudley of the University of Virginia was just such a player, and as his son-in-law concludes in Dudley’s biography, Bill was possibly the most talented 60-minute man to ever suit up. In his final college game in 1941, he was on the field for 113 plays. He once played eight different positions in a single game, and his exceptional multiple talents were a continued theme during his professional career. In 1946, when he was named the NFL’s Most Valuable Player, Dudley led the league in rushing, punt returns, interceptions, and the unusual statistical category of lateral passes.

Here’s an excerpt from Bullet Bill Dudley:

“Nobody had seen anything like this one-man backfield. Each home game that year set an attendance record, beating the previous week by about 2,000 paying customers.

“They were coming to see something unique in football. Sure, there were triple threats and there were versatile ballplayers, but Bill was playing fifty minutes or more per game. He rushed. He passed. He caught passes. He kicked and punted. He returned kicks and punts. He kicked extra points. He led the [National Football League] in interceptions. He was playing the modern equivalent of eight players on offense, defense, and special teams. Bill was the league standout.”

4 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.