9 sports books to ring out 2015 and ring in 2016

Variety is the spice of sports reading. Here are excerpts from a diverse new crop of sports books – covering everything from Obama's grasp of basketball to the greats of the NHL.

7. ’The Uncrowned Champs: How the 1963 San Diego Chargers Would Have Won the Super Bowl,’ by Dave Steidel

Until the Joe Namath-led New York Jets shocked everyone by upsetting the Baltimore Colts in Super Bowl III, it was widely assumed that no champion from the upstart American Football League stood a chance of beating the NFL’s champion. The far older NFL was the established league that appeared to have the superior players, yet football historian Dave Steidel wasn’t so sure that was the case in 1963, three years before the NFL champions and AFL champions first squared off in the Super Bowl. He takes a detailed look at the 11-3 season of the innovative, high-scoring San Diego Chargers, a season that culminated in a 51-10 mauling of the Boston Patriots in the AFL championship game.Then in a computer simulation, he describes a virtual showdown between the Chargers and the Chicago Bears, the NFL champs. The final score: San Diego 30, Chicago 20.

Here’s an excerpt from The Uncrowned Champs:

“The San Diego Chargers, who finished with an 11-3 record, ran away from the Boston Patriots, 51-10, to win the [1963] AFL title with an explosive offense and the best defense in the league. As AFL supporters were clamoring about their Chargers being the best team in pro football, there was a suggestion that an AFL vs. NFL championship game should be played to determine a true champion. NFL supporters were quick to pull the trigger and shoot holes in the claim as being whimsical and repudiated the suggestion, citing the notion that no AFL team led by a castoff quarterback and an inferior roster could touch the best defensive team the NFL had seen in years [the Chicago Bears].

“This would be the same rhetoric that would surface prior to January 12, 1969, when the Baltimore Colts brought their ‘best ever’ defense to Super Bowl III and were favored to win by 17 points over the New York Jets. As we all know of ‘Broadway’ Joe Namath’s famous promise, the Jets would be victorious, 16.-7.”

7 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.