'The Everything Store': 5 behind-the-scenes stories about Amazon

Business journalist Brad Stone takes a look at the founding of Amazon and how it operates in his new book 'The Everything Store'.

4. Less space for creativity

Amazon's editorial department, which was responsible for writing copy to advertise products and deciding which products to focus on, suffered as the company progressed. Editorial staff members would write clever ad copy for items ("This adorable Goliath Backpack Pal is a grrreat way to scare away those first-day-of-school jitters," a 1999 Amazon ad for a lion backpack read), but they soon found themselves in trouble as Amazon began to increasingly rely on analytics to decide which products to recommend to customers based on what they'd already bought. Most of the editorial writers and editors were fired or switched to other departments.

An algorithm titled Amabot, which could create the recommendations for customers based on past items he or she had bought, was blamed by many editorial employees for the downfall of the department. An unknown person, presumably an Amazon employee, sent a classified ad to the Seattle newspaper the Stranger in 2002 which read, "Dearest Amabot, If you only had a heart to absorb our hatred... Thanks for nothing, you jury-rigged rust bucket. The gorgeous messiness of flesh and blood will prevail!"

4 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.