‘Long Shot’: 8 observations shared in Mike Piazza’s autobiography

Check out some of Piazza's thoughts on baseball from his autobiography 'Long Shot.'

5. Comparison with some other good-hitting catchers

Ed Betz/AP

In 1997, Piazza’s .362 batting average tied the highest average ever previously recorded by a catcher, first set by the Yankees’ Bill Dickey in 1936. In 2009, Minnesota’s Joe Mauer surpassed them both by batting .365. Mauer has won three American League batting titles compared with none for Piazza, who calls Mauer’s titles “a remarkable accomplishment.”

Having said that, however, Piazza makes some interesting points. One is that Mauer batted .365 while playing catcher in 105 games and Dickey batted. 362 in 107 games. Piazza, meanwhile, had to play considerably more games behind the plate – 139 – which may have meant he wasn’t as fresh toward the end of season. Playing in the National League, he wasn’t able to spend a game each week at designated hitter as Mauer sometimes did. And in terms of winning a batting title, Piazza had the misfortune of competing against one of the all-time greats in San Diego’s Tony Gwynn, who captured eight batting crowns.

When it comes to selecting baseball’s best complete catcher of all-time, Piazza says that he gives Cincinnati’s Johnny Bench the nod. But he considers himself a complete hitter, based on both power and average.

5 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.