5 revelations from 'Game Change'

As the bestselling book 'Game Change' becomes an HBO movie, here are the 5 most interesting stories from the book.

3. Hillary Clinton's unbridled self-assurance

Gary Cameron/Reuters

“Prideful, aggrieved, confused – and still high on the notion she was leading an army, Napoleon in a navy pantsuit and gumball-sized fake pearls.”

So begins the damning portrait Heilemann and Halperin paint of then-Senator Clinton.

Perceiving the young senator from Illinois as a mere distraction, Clinton expected to coast to victory in the nominating contest, according to “Game Change.” “Hillary could still barely fathom that he was in the race at all,” Heilemann and Halperin write.

As early as 18 months before the November general election, Clinton began contemplating whom she would choose as her running mate and considering her transition to the White House. She “had already determined without a sliver of doubt that she was not going to choose Obama,” the authors write. She had even asked Roger Altman, deputy Treasury secretary in her husband’s administration, to lead a secret project planning her transition to the White House.

The worst blow came in Iowa, when Clinton lost the state primary, according to Heilemann and Halperin. As her “senior-most lieutenants” watched her “bitter and befuddled reaction,” they write, they thought, “This woman shouldn’t be president.”

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.