In a move meant to provoke a legal challenge over limits placed on federally controlled land in Utah, lawmakers there passed a bill last week giving the state power to seize national forests and other federal lands for development.
While the lawmakers want to grab portions of the federal land, they are also looking to make a strong statement about states’ rights and Utah’s frustrations over having two-thirds of its land under federal authority.
Republican lawmaker Rep. Mike Noel called the bill “an act of self-preservation,” according to the Salt Lake Tribune, and others have said the state has "sovereign" rights over all the land within its borders.
If the law is eventually passed, it will certainly meet swift legal challenges. And that’s largely the point, say many Utah lawmakers, who want the issue argued in the US Supreme Court even though the court has ruled against states in similar cases.
Utah has long been at loggerheads with the federal government over land use, and at the forefront of pushing for states' rights.
“Utah’s been at this for decades,” wrote Jodi Peterson on the Goat blog at High Country News. She points out that the state has attempted to claim right-of-way access on federal land, wrecked signs forbidding off-road vehicle access, and bulldozed roads leading to national monuments.
An uproar in Utah recently followed news of a leaked Interior Department memo that said the government was considering new national monuments in Utah and elsewhere in the West. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), along with other lawmakers, quickly penned a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stressing that any new monument designations should be subject to rigorous public debate.
While Utah's lawmakers may have succeeded in reviving the debate over land rights, environmental groups say they doubt the bill is going anywhere.