The constants behind the news
From Wikileaks to "60 Minutes," exposes provide new ways of seeing the world. But the underlying facts often remain unchanged.
Surface-level news can often be peeled back to reveal new insights. Take reports in the Washington Post, based on Wikileaks information, indicating that the United States has been funding anti-regime broadcasts into Syria. Syrian leaders, faced with a growing protest movement, are likely to seize on news to try to discredit democracy activists.
Also consider allegations first made on the CBS news program "60 Minutes" that the author Greg Mortenson may have been less than honest in his book "Three Cups of Tea" and may have misdirected money meant for school children in Afghanistan and Pakistan. People who have given to Mr. Mortenson's Central Asia Institute may rightly feel they have been misled.
And yet in both these cases, even if the new information is correct, it doesn't change the basics.
The United States has long supported democracy activities around the world. That doesn't invalidate the hunger for democracy in Syria any more than Radio Free Europe's broadcasts did in the days of the Soviet Union. Nor do questions surrounding Mortenson negate his message of promoting peace through education, especially for girls.
News can provide fresh insights, but the underlying facts remain constant: People the world over want freedom, no less in Syria than elsewhere. And education is better than warfare -- in Afghanistan and around the corner.
Note to readers: If you would like to see an early version of this column, plus our selection of the most important stories of the day, click here to subscribe to the Monitor's Daily News Briefing.