In nuclear crisis, an information dilemma

Tokyo and Washington are having to balance the need to deliver prompt information to the public about radiation danger with a desire not to panick the population.

  • close
    International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Yukiya Amano speaks to the media upon his arrival at Narita international airport, east of Tokyo. Japanese engineers are racing to restore a power cable to a quake-ravaged nuclear power plant in the hope of restarting pumps needed to pour cold water on overheating fuel rods and avert a catastrophic release of radiation.
    REUTERS/Issei Kato
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

One of the most difficult tasks a leader can face is deciding when, how, and how much information should be shared with the public. Everybody applauds the idea of transparency and openness. But there's always the possibility of spreading fear and causing panic.

The Japanese government, which is fighting to stabilize the crippled reactors at Fukushima, is also struggling to cope with the aftermath of last week's epic tsunami. The economy is reeling. A massive movement of people out of Tokyo because of radiation fears would only worsen things. But that has to be weighed against the actual dangers posed by radiation.

The Obama administration, meanwhile, appears to have concluded that even heroic efforts will not save the nuclear facilities. It is urging Americans to move far away. The US military is beginning to transport the families of service members out of the country.

That may be the right precaution to take for Americans. The Japanese have no such choice.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.