Ballyhooed 'Showgirls' Does a Bellyflop

REMEMBER ''Showgirls,'' the sexually explicit movie that got all the media hype? Critics called it pornographic. But Hollywood poured $40 million into it. Moguls hoped the slickly produced film would break down barriers to X-type movies in America's suburban malls.

After a strong opening weekend in September, however, revenues plunged. By its fifth week, the film had dropped off the Top-20 list. So far, ''Showgirls'' has recouped only about half its original cost.

Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), said before ''Showgirls'' debuted: ''If you make a movie that a lot of people want to see, no rating will hurt you. But if you make a movie few people want to see, no rating will help you.''

''Showgirls'' was rated NC-17 (the successor to ''X'') by MPAA.

Now Mr. Valenti says: '' 'Showgirls' wasn't a good picture ... because it wasn't entertaining.''

Travis Reid, executive vice president of Sony Theaters in New York, says: ''The marketing campaign was more effective than the film.''

Jane Brown, a media professor at the University of North Carolina, suggests that the film's failure shows that ''the American public have better sense than they are usually given credit for.''

of stories this month > Get unlimited stories
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Unlimited digital access $11/month.

Get unlimited Monitor journalism.