I ain't a prude, but...

BY and large, I don't consider myself a prude. A prune, maybe, according to a few critical but unenlightened readers. But a prude? No. Except in a few minor cases where being a prude is the intelligent thing to be. Where I am put to the test, however, is in listening to the English used on television, filling the already badly educated minds of our children. I readily agree English is a living, growing language, but that doesn't excuse the wanton and senseless destruction of it by commentators with million-dollar contracts. If they can't speak good English, why pay them so much?

A lot of them avoid the word ``good'' because a lot of morons on TV use ``good'' incorrectly. Therefore they all use the word ``well'' incorrectly to prove they have background. As one highly paid commentator said recently, ``The dress looks well on Nancy.'' Oh, really? To me that conveys a picture of a dress full of eyes, peering in every direction. The dress looked good on Nancy. With annoying consistency commentators say things similar to, ``It is difficult to deal with those kind of governments.'' Why can't they deserve their salary by saying, ``... that kind of government''?

Oh, yes, I did go up the wall when an actress - one million dollars a picture - was asked where she got her expensive diamond necklace. ``I get all my jewl-ery abroad,'' she said. I say if she doesn't know how to say jewelry, it ought to be snatched off her, then and there.

The word ``hopefully'' has gone beyond all hope. As one college football player said: ``They won't win the game tomorrow, hopefully.'' Just once, can't some student, professor, senator, president, or man-in-the-street say, ``I hope they won't win the game tomorrow''?

But, as I say, I am not a prude and English is a living language, so I can put up with questionable English when the wisdom involved outweighs the sensitivity for grammar. ``If it ain't broke, don't fix it.''

Then just when the day is going along pleasantly a theater critic asks a newly risen star when he will start his next picture. ``Like November,'' is the answer.

We'll have to let it go at that.

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.