Canada's Ma Bell holds on to its monopoly

In the Great White North, Ma Bell still rules supreme. Bell Canada, roughly the equivalent of what AT&T used to be, has been allowed to keep its monopoly on long-distance service in Canada, or at least the parts of Canada it serves.

The Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission has ruled against competition, saying it ``would not be in the public interest'' to approve an application from CNCP Telecommunications to provide cheaper long-distance charges.

Ontario, Quebec, and the Northwest Territories are served by Bell Canada. BC-Tel handles British Columbia. Those two phone companies handle 80 percent of long-distance calls in Canada. Ontario and Quebec have more than half the population of Canada; BC is the third-most-populous province.

At issue is whether high-priced long-distance calls should support cheap local service. Residential phone service in Ottawa, for example, is C$9.35 a month. In Washington, D.C., the same service would cost twice that, and in Portland, Ore., even more.

Long-distance rates are cheaper in the United States because of competition by companies such as MCI and GTE Sprint. Canadian long-distance charges are basically the same as in the US, but there is no cut-rate service and there are no alternative carriers. Many Canadians close to the border can route calls through the US and still save money.

The CRTC hearing was a battle of the giants -- Bell Canada against CNCP, which is a partnership of two big Canadian railroads. CNCP already handles telex service, which is profitable, and its connections to the rich railway companies would have meant there were no start-up problems.

With the year-old Conservative government in Ottawa, competition and cheaper rates seemed certain to win. CNCP even prepared ads in newspapers on the day of the decision, saying, ``The future of long-distance dialing is here.'' The ads were pulled when the ruling went against CNCP.

Bell Canada and BC-Tel are happy with the decision but not happy with the gap between long-distance and local rates. Both companies asked to ``rebalance'' the rates, meaning higher local charges and lower long-distance ones. There was even a proposal to put local calls on a meter, charging by the minute. This is aimed at computer users who tie up lines with long transmissions.

CRTC chairman Andr'e Bureau conceded there is ``an imbalance between long-distance and local rates,'' but he still refused any change.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
QR Code to Canada's Ma Bell holds on to its monopoly
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today