Apple lawsuit all but confirms self-driving car rumors

Most of us realized that Apple is preparing to build autonomous electric cars earlier this week. But now Apple has been sued for poaching engineers for a new battery division, a key factor in driving down costs for electric car production. 

The Apple logo is pictured on the front of a retail store in the Marina neighborhood in San Francisco. Rumors of Apple planning to build its own autonomous car have been swirling for some time, but a lawsuit from car battery manufacturer A123 Systems added fuel to the argument this week.

Robert Galbraith/Reuters/File

February 20, 2015

Earlier this week, most of the internet realized that the rumors are true: Apple is preparing to build autonomous electric cars like its high-tech rival, Google.

But for those who still refuse to believe that Tim Cook & Co. could do such a thing, consider this new bombshell: according to electric-car battery manufacturer A123 SystemsApple has been poaching its engineers in the hopes of building its own battery division.

The accusation comes from a lawsuit alleging that Apple has been aggressively recruiting A123's engineers since June of 2014. The suit says that at Apple, A123's former employees are conducting work on lithium-ion batteries similar to work they carried out at A123, which is a violation of the non-disclosure and other agreements they signed when joining A123.

In Kentucky, the oldest Black independent library is still making history

Worse -- at least for A123 -- the employees Apple lured away were so important and so specialized, their projects at A123 had to be sidelined after their departure. One of the new Apple hires has also been charged with recruiting other engineers and with building competing relationships with A123's suppliers. 

When news first broke about Apple's electric car project, many cited as proof the company's recent hiring of former Tesla employees, many of whom are skilled in hardware and software development. A123 claims that other companies could soon lose engineers to Apple, including LG, Panasonic, Samsung, and Toshiba.

Neither A123 nor Apple has commented publicly on the lawsuit. 

OUR TAKE

Even if you were caught off-guard by the revelation that Apple is exploring -- if not already building -- electric cars, today's news probably doesn't carry the same punch.

A majority of Americans no longer trust the Supreme Court. Can it rebuild?

After all, if we've learned nothing else from Tesla Motors and its CEO Elon Musk, we've learned that bringing down the cost of batteries is crucial to makingelectric cars affordable and attractive to consumers. That's why Tesla launched the first of what may be several "gigafactories": to develop its own, more efficient batteries and to ramp up the scale of production, reducing the cost.

Furthermore, we know that Apple is notoriously proprietary, particularly with key technology -- and when it comes to electric cars, few things are more key than the batteries. Dropping battery production into Apple's business model ensures that its technology remains proprietary. And as an added bonus, licensing that could give Apple a new revenue stream in the future.