Russia vows revenge after Kremlin confirms bomb caused Egypt crash

The Metrojet jet was downed over Egypt's Sinai Peninsula on Oct. 31, an attack claimed by Islamic State. Russian officials say there is growing consensus with Western powers on fighting Islamist terrorism.

Mohamed Abd El Ghany/Reuters
Military investigators from Russia stand near the debris of a Russian airliner at its crash site at the Hassana area in Arish city, north Egypt, November 1, 2015.

Russian President Vladimir Putin vowed to step up his country's military campaign against Islamist militants in Syria, after Kremlin officials concluded that the Russian jetliner that crashed in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula on Oct. 31 was brought down by a bomb.

"We will find them anywhere on the planet and punish them," Mr. Putin said at a security meeting late Monday night, referring to the terrorists behind the bombing. Though he did not single out the self-proclaimed Islamic State as responsible for the attack, Putin said that "Our air force's military work in Syria must not simply be continued. It must be intensified in such a way that the criminals understand that retribution is inevitable."

IS quickly claimed responsibility for bringing down the Airbus jet carrying 224 people, mostly Russian tourists, from Sharm al-Shiekh to St. Petersburg. It said it was in retaliation for Russia's decision to provide air support to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Russia initially pushed back against claims by Britain and the US that a bomb was "more likely than not" the cause, and insisted on patience while the investigation continued. 

Now, the head of Russia's security bureau, the FSB has confirmed that the Metrojet flight was brought down by "a homemade bomb containing up to 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) of TNT." Egyptian investigators, who have been working with the Russians, say they have not yet finished their work.

But the Kremlin left no room for doubt in its announcement overnight. "We can unequivocally say it was a terrorist act," FSB chief Alexander Bortnikov said. Reuters reports that he said traces of the explosive were found both on fragments of the plane and in passengers' belongings.

Reuters also reports that two Sharm al-Shiekh airport personnel have been detained by Egypt in connection with the bombing, though Egyptian interior ministry officials have denied that is the case to local media.

The Russian announcement, coming just days after gunmen killed more than 129 people in a series of attacks in Paris allegedly on IS orders, increases the possibility of a "grand coalition" of both Western and Russian forces against the Islamist group. The French government announced today that it plans to hold talks to that end with both Russia and the US, "to increase our efforts and be more effective even against [IS]," The Washington Post reports.

Russia put forward the idea of such an anti-IS coalition in late September, just before it launched its air campaign in Syria. The Christian Science Monitor reported yesterday that the attacks in Paris, along with similarly devastating suicide bombings in Beirut and Ankara in recent weeks, are tilting the West toward working with Russia on a common solution in Syria, one that would both minimize IS and seek to resolve the country's civil war.

“There is a new pragmatism emerging in Europe to work with Russia and Iran, and other European partners, and to try and work towards a political solution,” says Eugene Rogan, director of the Middle East Centre at the University of Oxford. ...

The terror attacks in Paris will add to the sense of urgency, at least for Europeans, who have already felt increasing pressures from the growing refugee crisis to move on a negotiated solution for Syria, experts say.

Talks in Vienna on Syria have already made more progress in the past 10 days than in the previous four years, says Andrei Klimov, deputy chair of the international affairs committee of the Federation Council, Russia's Senate. A rough draft of a transitional program lays out a path to a ceasefire, a new Syrian constitution, and fresh elections within 18 months. Crucially, this was jointly announced by Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry in Vienna on Saturday.

“A lot has happened rather quickly in the wake of Russia's intervention, and it's pleasant to note that our initiatives are finally getting some traction," says Mr. Klimov. "But peoples' minds are also being focused by the victories the Russian-backed Syrian forces are gaining in the field, and by the terrible tragedies from recent terrorist strikes in Turkey, Lebanon, and now Paris. We do see movement, and we are hopeful."

But despite common interest in a diplomatic resolution in Syria, it is unclear if and how IS can be brought down, as neither Russia nor Western powers seem ready to commit ground troops to the conflict. The Associated Press notes that Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the possibility was not being considered, while US and other Western capitals have repeatedly ruled out fighting on the ground.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.