Pakistani Taliban storms military base in Peshawar in show of resilience

At least 17 were killed in the attack, making it the deadliest Taliban strike since miliants killed at least 20 people in a Shiite mosque in February. 

Reuters
Security officials keep guard near an air force base in Peshawar on Friday just hours after it was attacked by Taliban gunmen.

A daily summary of global reports on security issues.

A bold attack by the Pakistani Taliban on a mosque inside an Air Force base outside Peshawar is the deadliest against the Pakistani armed forces since a massacre at a military-run school last December.

At least 17 people – mostly those in prayer – were killed in the attack, which led to an hours-long shootout. Some 13 assailants were also reported dead, according to The Associated Press. It's unknown if other attackers got away. 

The attack demonstrates the Taliban’s resiliency and ability “to mount devastating attacks despite a military campaign and tougher government measures against them following the massacre of more than 150 people at an army-run school last December,” Reuters reports.

The attack began in the early morning when more than 10 militants entered the compound from two directions, Maj. Gen. Asim Bajwa said on Twitter. He said the men were immediately fired upon and at least one of the attackers was able to enter the mosque, according to The Washington Post. A captain was killed during the militant attack, and some 10 soldiers were wounded, reports The Wall Street Journal.

The compound, called Camp Badaber, no longer operates as a military facility, according to The Los Angeles Times. But it houses multiple air force officers and their families, as well as running two training schools.

"We were offering prayers when we first heard the gunshots and then, within no time, they entered the mosque where they began indiscriminately firing," Mohammad Ikram, a member of the Pakistani Air Force who was in the mosque at the time of the attack, told Reuters from the hospital.

The Pakistani Taliban, known as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, claimed responsibility for the attack Friday, saying it was in retaliation for military operations in the mountainous northwestern tribal region on the border with Afghanistan.

“[We] targeted officers of the infidels’ front-line air force, which rains fire and iron on Islam-loving Muslims across Pakistan, including the tribal areas,” the group said in a statement.

According to Reuters:

Attacks by the Taliban have fallen about 70 percent this year, following a military offensive against the militants' bases along the Afghan border and the government's redoubled efforts to combat them.

Despite the reduction in attacks, the militants still manage to strike high-value targets. The home minister of Punjab province was among 16 killed in a suicide attack last month.

Last February, the Taliban killed at least 20 people in a Shiite mosque in Pakistan. Two months earlier, the group murdered 150 people, mostly children, at a military-affiliated school in Peshawar.

In the aftermath, authorities vowed a tougher crackdown on the Taliban.

According to The Christian Science Monitor, the February attack on Shiite worshippers was part of an emerging tactic to engender more support for the Taliban:

The Taliban appear to be using religious minorities as “soft targets” in Pakistan – on the assumption that attacks on Christians and Shiite Muslims will win them sympathy with a local audience here that has been steadily radicalized over a number of years.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.