Saudi Arabia disputes deadly airstrike on refugee camp in Yemen

A Saudi-led coalition is trying to stop Yemen's major cities falling to Houthi Shiite insurgents after the removal of President Hadi, who has fled into exile. Rivalry with Shiite Iran lies behind the military intervention. 

Hani Mohammed/AP
Smoke rises from an area due to Saudi-led airstrikes in Sanaa, Yemen, Monday, March 30, 2015.

An airstrike killed dozens of civilians Monday at a camp for displaced families in northern Yemen, raising concerns of a humanitarian crisis in the Middle East’s most impoverished country.

The bombing appeared to be the single deadliest attack since a Saudi Arabia-led coalition launched a military campaign last week to halt the advance of Iranian-backed Shiite militiamen, known as Houthis, who control the capital, Sanaa. 

As the 10-member coalition of Sunni Arab governments presses its campaign – driven by its perception of Iran’s growing influence in the region – aid workers warn that the civilian death toll is sure to rise. Shelling overnight in Aden, the southern port city besieged by Houthi insurgents, killed 26 people, according to news reports that cited hospital officials. Warships have been deployed at Aden, a key target for Houthis. 

Joel Millman, a spokesman for the International Organization for Migration, told The Washington Post that as many as 40 people died and about 200 were wounded in Monday's attack in northern Hajjah Province. The Houthis said the Saudi-led coalition had bombed the Al-Mazraq refugee camp; Saudi officials denied that any airstrikes had been carried out there. 

“People in Al-Mazraq camp have been living in very harsh conditions since 2009, and now they have suffered the consequences of an airstrike on the camp,” Pablo Marco, Doctors Without Borders' operational manager for Yemen, said in a statement.

Saudi officials and others in the Sunni Arab coalition have threatened to send ground troops into Yemen. This has raised concerns that foreign occupiers could further destabilize Yemen, which is a haven for a powerful Al Qaeda affiliate.

As The Economist reports, “the only people to benefit from Yemen's disintegration may be Sunni jihadists pledging allegiance to either al-Qaeda or Islamic State.”

Long the target of American drone strikes, they have stepped up their attacks, stoking sectarian divisions that had rarely featured in Yemeni society. Diplomats have all but given up hope of sorting out the mess peacefully. Fighting may not do the trick either.

Saudi officials say their reason for military intervention in Yemen is to restore power to exiled President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi and to drive back the Houthis from the country’s south. 

The Shiite group recently came close to taking control of the country’s four largest cities, The New York Times reports. Coalition forces, including warships from Egypt, are still struggling to stop the Houthis' advance into Aden, the last major city under the control of forces loyal to Mr. Hadi. Reuters reports that airstrikes continued overnight, hitting rebel targets across the country.

Meanwhile, Iran’s official news agency says Tehran flew aid to Yemen earlier today, according to The Associated Press, despite the Saudi-led coalition’s claim that it is in full control of the country’s airspace. The aid package, which contains 19 tons of medicines and medical equipment and two tons of food provided by the Iranian Red Crescent, is Iran’s first such shipment since airstrikes began last week.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.